Re: [OPSAWG] PLS request for time slots for presenting your drafts in OPSAWG mtg during IETF-80

Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@asgaard.org> Sun, 27 March 2011 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <cdl@asgaard.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58293A67EB for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBflxGK3cQ5O for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asgaard.org (odin.asgaard.org [204.29.151.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7013A67DB for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29531D8F16; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:55:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at asgaard.org
Received: from asgaard.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (odin.asgaard.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8zQQzfo-zDw8; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:55:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fenrir.asgaard.org (fenrir.asgaard.org [204.29.152.154]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51A371D8EFC; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:54:58 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-710-797149200"
From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@asgaard.org>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0402E6FDFB@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:54:56 +1100
Message-Id: <AAD96816-5580-480C-B164-0A8864508A9E@asgaard.org>
References: <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA895003F7CD09@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com> <20110325110443.6FFEC9F01F1@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0402E6FDFB@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.3.3
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:54:49 -0700
Cc: masum@cisco.com, Sundar.Iyer@team.telstra.com, mmorrow@cisco.com, opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] PLS request for time slots for presenting your drafts in OPSAWG mtg during IETF-80
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:53:26 -0000

I would support this interpretation.  If there is time, let it in, if not...

	Chris

On 25Mar2011, at 22.19, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi Scott and all, 
> 
> The rule that we had been following is that Internet-Drafts need to be
> submitted and accessible in the I-D directory before the submission
> deadline, so that they are available for interested attendees to access
> them from a well-known place and prepare for the meeting. Of course
> exceptions can be admitted sometimes, but they need to be exceptions. My
> advice is to give priority to the items in the agenda that are backed by
> Internet-Drafts properly submitted with the deadlines. If there is time
> left at the end of the OPSAWG + OPSAREA meeting we can let room for
> other items, as the OPSAREA agenda ends anyway with a open microphone
> time slot. 
> 
> I would also recommend that each presenter focuses on explaining why the
> respective document and work item is relevant for the scope of the
> OPSAWG. We should assume that people have read the documents and that we
> can focus on the discussion how relevant they are for the area and for
> the WG (this is why we need the documents available in advance). 
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Scott O. Bradner [mailto:sob@harvard.edu] 
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 1:05 PM
>> To: mmorrow@cisco.com; opsawg@ietf.org; sob@harvard.edu; 
>> vumip1@gmail.com
>> Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); ietf@cdl.asgaard.org; 
>> masum@cisco.com; rbonica@juniper.net; Sundar.Iyer@team.telstra.com
>> Subject: RE: PLS request for time slots for presenting your 
>> drafts in OPSAWG mtg during IETF-80
>> 
>> humm - that looks like postings on a wiki not submission as 
>> Internet Drafts and I do not find them in the Internet Drafts 
>> directory
>> 
>> also they are not legit Internet Drafts names
>> 
>> my normal rule is not let anything on teh agenda whch was not 
>> published as an Internet Draft
>> 
>> ADs - is this a new replacement for IDs that I've not heard about?
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>> 

---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc