Re: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]

Adrian Farrel <> Tue, 29 September 2020 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4543D3A0D3E; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q3s-ZE8KPPtK; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED1013A0D3D; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08TEJkoR031624; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:19:46 +0100
Received: from (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C4F2203D; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:19:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA75F2203C; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:19:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08TEJiZ5017154 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:19:45 +0100
Reply-To: <>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <>
To: "'Tianran Zhou'" <>, "'opsawg'" <>
Cc: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:19:43 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <01bd01d6966b$941fafe0$bc5f0fa0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BE_01D69673.F5E48D10"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQIa/LBvCXyixkYioPQmAHKNYccZ46j23GKw
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--24.129-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--24.129-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--24.128600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: rYpa/RC+czHxIbpQ8BhdbDjNGpWCIvfT+IfriO3cV8RYbPLopoBzQhtn H+9MJT6tkzZ31gepaWbTtVEL74Pv9T9eQPOGA9ojlVHM/F6YkvTgoZy93PpPfE0SXxd4W9zI093 qg1itxqnpyoDUx4XXpJCCC5lSOXCBnE4xp5pGReHbDD1in4vngNMB70WyBtjHOTs4nokdBFQXxG DD7ldukJ+wEox7v7wHWWzqBh0gvIAfospopQ643TGo9I70+NN5bKA7yD1j1eB0PA/ki2kI7LnqJ NXIccKryd44Sucb672v8TAvJrvuV7QJ4oUF56vogRTWSf0X8xmOz/LLJUcaHmzd8mVlXGBx2TaX uLehzjNHDd+lAeDDe5frKASrZ1StFV8UNif6+uaphk0MrYwMJVsP0tBwe3qDMDH8ciA/3Z2pFku oLGicpI0ogGHrw9oBQUUiDKo91af3yGhlFWBvlRlLm7Fc/E3pqGj+YxBQdJjDv5dDcuT2eaud22 2l+s63veL9dWZ+mC9POelFA6srAJcFdomgH0lnFEUknJ/kEl6063Wh9WVqgqbyPFGTn+O46/Llc 12r74OEFYiZRsDydVPFjtkBHchFN+FjKfwsXfDiKdmjm4S/KVqw5PPiPB+UMPtHoS9Wmog=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:20:02 -0000



I'm a Contributor to this document.


I'm not of aware of any IPR associated with this document that has not
already been disclosed.





From: OPSAWG <> On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: 24 September 2020 07:43
To: opsawg <>
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]


Sorry for attaching a wrong link to the draft. Please see as follows.

Hi Authors,
Accompany with the WG LC, this mail starts the IPR poll.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04?
If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04,
please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
email in OPSAWG mailing list regardless of whether or not you are aware of
any relevant IPR. The document will not advance to the next stage until a
response has been received from each author and contributor.
If you are not listed as an author or contributor but are on OPSAWG mailing
list, then please explicitly respond if you are aware of any IPR that has
not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.