IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Tue, 10 October 2017 02:59 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926A81323B4; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qSJ-0YvtHlIB; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 455EB132153; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DQF61278; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 02:59:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 03:59:26 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.11]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:59:15 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
CC: "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
Thread-Index: AdMx1mdmlA5ckKCRRgOkkH52TiYS4gPnOxKg
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 02:59:15 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A2469960@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A2449947@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A2449947@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.156.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.59DC378F.009B, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.11, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: c398ebfeb14d328c0b2a74da5ea630fa
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/97pAOxL28kpMpJmjE5FwK6b8OY8>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 02:59:31 -0000

Hi WG,

This call is concluded without objection on the revision.
Let's move forward to IESG.

Thanks,
Tianran

> -----Original Message-----
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 2:05 PM
> To: opsawg@ietf.org
> Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
> 
> Dear OPSAWG,
> 
> The following draft was sent to IESG, but received some critical comments.
> 
> Alternate Tunnel Encapsulation for Data Frames in CAPWAP
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
> 
> Now the authors have addressed all the comments, and received confirmation
> from the Security DIR reviewer.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-
> 09-secdir-early-meadows-2017-08-10/
> 
> This is a notice to start a two-week OPSAWG WG last call review for the
> document.
> Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections
> to this mailing list.
> Please indicate your support or concerns by Wednesday Oct 4, 2017.
> 
> Please note that the authors decided to change the document type to
> Experimental, as stated below:
> 1.3.  History of the document
>    This document was started to accommodate Service Provider's need of a
>    more flexible deployment mode with alternative tunnels [RFC7494].
>    Experiments and tests have been done for this alt-tunnel network
>    infrastructure.  However important, the deployment of relevant
>    technology is yet to complete.  This experimental document is
>    intended to serve as a historical reference for any future work as to
>    the operational and deployment requirements.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tianran, as co-chair
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email