Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-06.txt> (A Framework for Automating Service and Network Management with YANG) to Informational RFC
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22D53A1128; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwXMAtPLZ7I7; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4F83A1123; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id t7so3277114pjd.3; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ChIxes/7uQvf7oYlGPNBb0C8AR/JS2beRxgxGkM3uNA=; b=ftufpO10GmMiJIZIRi/aXDJrrZXA8oCweT0EyG1Ad1y0uTozmc/9G3+mZMM13B3kDb txf0+QFQN85tLEQTW9zvcfvgquLa2P/rpF0G8t9dsVNV8sFFvJwdAIuFD42GSgUWWoGO 2rq1GoTixWHHhQuIW4tOGbViuLmUUULu6Gl2DE4SUWma4YE23uS0O7f74Tcbqrjtsjfm EoANfYsQ5cFf0lLYsDWXYpM4C/cnB5VNQumNmHstSycEQCoV1F87a83p5kxjjftTrqsF 0FYlJChgyB0yeGccbd5nbPGCDkMyxCItBlBwVH1B/Hqebtf7C+CTZuPHD5oXENERYYj3 EPMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ChIxes/7uQvf7oYlGPNBb0C8AR/JS2beRxgxGkM3uNA=; b=EdhjwwBbhoMEmXSxQhHcbyT4/nlhqYG78Dw0ujn2nnJBQMvNRycklnsYytQAPMXLg4 sCp2cuAWG73NVIHkBzwOH3N6WFaPOnqMihl8Ze0NBxRTa3C1zK+J770vHBRuTCRue3Oy pDVuzp9PtiCP8OM/IKFEZEKzp4Fp3epIeVtletmRa/Qg3bSlZxZaRSYUyJIiQVNv6Xdo ykOOoxg95l/snXZQIsLcoOe0b4N795pU83qP3N0Zjzq/C3GnOx3Yv78seWQ2DoIzDUHV MbE5ejzIybQWdl2LZ/N0Te6h1of4CQOYxvE6Ad0xvQ7EjkjX7uvMSRYFMr0+y/6M6rNa GQpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300L0HgkJFsH/vDRGdMA5Y0EzfUUM2G9aX/WhfEG427nwB7LLlC pnhWXhwMoUPUi1bge+5ltRSU/6LKAckA+A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPR8fXoGCmTSnBX9yv4/C1Mur7+vjIqHbvNf1AxOcFrEZRasryhhnQKfT4pRQktLCrCbSmmw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d515:: with SMTP id t21mr5056335pju.149.1601409293163; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.138.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z28sm6296981pfq.81.2020.09.29.12.54.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework.all@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <160095255684.28293.2595806209469918634@ietfa.amsl.com> <0ae283b5-1675-9995-757f-d6e6ccbd6d54@gmail.com> <13759_1601358037_5F72C8D5_13759_498_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031549FD3@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <de9bb4f6-5225-c820-8ddd-aaab73b6236d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:54:49 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <13759_1601358037_5F72C8D5_13759_498_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031549FD3@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/9O_8baKBIJFdw-YzOD5UQPGW5yM>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-06.txt> (A Framework for Automating Service and Network Management with YANG) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:54:56 -0000
Hi Med, see below... On 29-Sep-20 18:40, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Please see inline. > > Cheers, > Med > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com] >> Envoyé : mardi 29 septembre 2020 00:25 >> À : last-call@ietf.org >> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework.all@ietf.org; >> opsawg@ietf.org >> Objet : Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation- >> framework-06.txt> (A Framework for Automating Service and Network >> Management with YANG) to Informational RFC >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a question for clarification, and then a comment. >> >> First, consider these extracts: >> >>> 5.1. L2VPN/L3VPN Service Delivery >>> >>> In reference to Figure 5, the following steps are performed to >>> deliver the L3VPN service within the network management >> automation >>> architecture defined in this document: >>> >>> 1. The Customer requests to create two sites (as per service >>> creation operation in Section 4.2.1)... >> ... >>> 5.2. VN Lifecycle Management >>> >>> In reference to Figure 7, the following steps are performed to >>> deliver the VN service within the network management automation >>> architecture defined in this document: >>> >>> 1. Customer requests (service exposure operation in Section >> 4.1.1) >>> to create 'VN' based on Access point... >> ... >>> 3. The Customer exchanges connectivity-matrix on abstract node >> and >>> explicit path using TE topology model with the >> orchestrator... >> >> In those examples, how does the customer "request" or "exchange" >> data? I assume this is intended to happen by software, rather than >> by telefax. > > [Med] We hope this can be by software if we want to benefit from the automation in the full cycle but the approach still apply independently how a service request is captured. > > We don't zoom that much on that interface because the document is more on the provider's side. > >> So what protocol is involved, and which entity on the >> customer side is doing it? > > [Med] The component at the client side are generally represented as service ordering (see RFC 4176). That component may interact with the Order Handling at the provider side using a variety of means such as https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8921.txt (Section 5) or by offering a management interface to the customer, etc. Well, I'd rather see a standardised and generic solution to that problem, as noted in my reply to Adrian. But indeed, that is the requirement. > Please let us know if you think that we need to add some text on this part. I think it needs just a few words in section 3 or 4, even just to say that the mechanism is out of scope for this document. > >> >>> 5.3. Event-based Telemetry in the Device Self Management >>> >>> In reference to Figure 8, the following steps are performed to >>> monitor state changes of managed objects or resources in a >> network >>> device and provide device self-management within the network >>> management automation architecture defined in this document: >>> >>> 1. To control which state a network device should be in or is >>> allowed to be in at any given time, a set of conditions and >>> actions are defined and correlated with network events >> (e.g., >>> allow the NETCONF server to send updates... >> >> Second, this is the first mention of NETCONF in the document, and >> the only other mention is in the Security Considerations. I suggest >> that there should be a short description of the role of NETCONF (and >> RESTCONF) earlier in the document, either in section 3 or more >> likely in section 4 (Functional Blocks and Interactions). > > [Med] Point taken. We will also clarify that in some cases the use of YANG does not require NETCONF/RESTCONF. Thanks. (For example, draft-ietf-anima-grasp-distribution can serve for distributing YANG.) Brian > >> >> Regards >> Brian Carpenter > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. >
- [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-auto… The IESG
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… Qin Wu
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-model-… Brian E Carpenter