Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 February 2021 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0FB3A15D1; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:00:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DiB6p6Hm7SeU; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:00:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 798283A15CF; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:00:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id m13so20840294oig.8; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:00:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a7n0smhyq0DBoXYHlu+PPUAK30bcMr1EjBrD++cbevs=; b=VE9Wd245bcMNesfvlAxXIRllCjj+Tbe7ghibRTGbCnwchhRWGhy3nojzV7lGCOwx0P f79hrA16zY8RsqQebcCej9OcBlAoiHkPC4ybYnG7gGPrUFu+9f6w385G3aObkvUkW/iC dw0NSYz1dZaojR3/pXNc+4vWoUHLKQqUJtAddPkg8mj37a9AibVk5W0+rNx5FrXgXfdZ 0x+Rp4FW8AJ9xVGfO4XiXY2PLRoye60GxqxGDU7PdY9V1F/rTRHpbNOQQqxrdOe6O5wi YRIXpJO8hG1BM3XJWBepjCh6Hl/aNkmV5S8iECdVgxxbHmzZ2wh/ZYyPS4HAc5/vUWeQ 5SdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a7n0smhyq0DBoXYHlu+PPUAK30bcMr1EjBrD++cbevs=; b=L/ewMmW1bOdgGxuNKhHchZpkFuXATJdWLGMfpgylLFxpF/V2sQ2h2XnHFmMX5Knnhn lJxljVjAy3fZar6MH3Z2S1mqFSPz/6i/5V7sD+M+HPsYoGVHXSEXQm1g9UV6spobVgtl 2axjTL5EqWb4jgwSUmn6QxxfCrLnmsV62IT7G1kwQq3/8BpZTNeICXZDXWjEt97z6Dde NGiMVFB/+jcyDlZKvgBRAlfDNztJSgDdsxHjiVJyoDNjZu+xubhTv1bhrj4DEO4apodk /nV+gGa3iUSOyepNHCjllTMhXngSYG743I+hlQTPrSYC2iWj8YgQlk28Z1E7fIKhE4Y5 Xwrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533aS14EpELsvwJ+RyvKTXWnhnPzMe4rZjktR/Ki6dfZCDqCy9U2 H8KK9yHUPTMwCGP+FqHrum34NrDZH4IqMugvqPopqRWdRhg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyTJNLIgMXZw+THEJqhgvbPygluCBQfNTtFFK4TiBu1lCmnjIBok+REIzV0PZl01WcyefeznnGY3jaUn/K1fk=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:6503:: with SMTP id m3mr911156oim.97.1612224051596; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:00:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <06bf01d6f884$18acfd10$4a06f730$@olddog.co.uk> <m2h7mvfv0p.wl-randy@psg.com> <075b01d6f8d8$c189db70$449d9250$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <075b01d6f8d8$c189db70$449d9250$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:00:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMGpriVLv2g1TFV_Wr8KvTKbqS03am3xf2PvhvAaqF=HVn8HeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Ops Area WG <opsawg@ietf.org>, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/9oxzBDmO79T78kjl1SM9mOakMR0>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:00:54 -0000

> 8805 was, of course, an Independent Stream production. So I carry as much
> responsibility as anyone else for the lack of privacy discussion. But, more
> significantly, I am entirely responsible for not having noted section 4 of
> RFC 8805 when I wrote my email - oops.

Yeah, I was pretty sure we had written something.  =)

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8805.html#name-privacy-considerations