Re: [OPSAWG] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13: (with COMMENT)

"Douglas Gash (dcmgash)" <dcmgash@cisco.com> Wed, 26 June 2019 04:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dcmgash@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE9212061C; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 21:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=ZX7oNV5a; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=kEbTaCjS
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UpspN1oSyqFn; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 21:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C88D1120222; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 21:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2406; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1561522555; x=1562732155; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=43B8p1mXTTGwikB4gbVSAczEbOON1Wsur2wCVTES3zE=; b=ZX7oNV5aJHJXzwsuUVxfkcxMY60HQez7a2413tb8KWI0I8jvcTq/yOIe MNePgTStiqa7+aXa8xvgTwdpaj/BVC9H1TQS841fsjwJXX9czldkU29RN uHyxoBrU9agLOEw5s9E7dNqK6MJz1dm8b7dxyf+WgYEMivcpgkx96Yybn c=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AXNu5iBRbdbyR4J/IM2Jr0Q0aTdpsv++ubAcI9p?= =?us-ascii?q?oqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBdfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH1?= =?us-ascii?q?5g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOiAxGctLT19N9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BxAAB48BJd/4cNJK1mHAEBAQQBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGBVAYBAQsBgUNQA2pVIAQLKIQVg0cDjmOaFIEuFIEQA1QJAQEBDAEBIwo?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQGEQAIXgl4jNQgOAQMBAQQBAQIBBW2KNwyFSwIEEhERDAEBNwEPAgEIGgI?= =?us-ascii?q?ZDQICAjAVEAIEAQ0FIoMAAYFqAx0BDpplAoE4iF9xgTGCeQEBBYFGQYMAGII?= =?us-ascii?q?RAwaBDCgBi10XgX+BECgfgkw+gmECAQIBgSoBEQIBHheCczKCJowHgk6NT41?= =?us-ascii?q?0CQKCFYZQiTCDaxuCKYcOjhiNKIEwhgePWwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUgI0Z1gRCHA?= =?us-ascii?q?VZQGCQYJBN4M5hRSFP3IBgSiOEQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,418,1557187200"; d="scan'208";a="291709857"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 26 Jun 2019 04:15:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (xch-rcd-018.cisco.com [173.37.102.28]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5Q4FrvY013931 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 04:15:53 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:15:52 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:15:51 -0400
Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:15:51 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=43B8p1mXTTGwikB4gbVSAczEbOON1Wsur2wCVTES3zE=; b=kEbTaCjSUNf8R9qtadA/Ke5WTumFcPL9vUTRJwFsBFV4iB7KAtZQZQvlYTl0AEdxN52ptEAxDHiUhiNiV5pSvxyO5oibOjEcLjaVmFiDU/Xj2+sSkY8hUE/Pzzxy/1Cewgo3Sxrvfi3OheHC51NCKIMluVZ6NHAP0pc8GCqhJ10=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1322.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.168.104.140) by DM5PR11MB1257.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.168.107.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2008.16; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 04:15:50 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1322.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3167:9c96:1d74:4fcd]) by DM5PR11MB1322.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3167:9c96:1d74:4fcd%2]) with mapi id 15.20.2008.018; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 04:15:50 +0000
From: "Douglas Gash (dcmgash)" <dcmgash@cisco.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs@ietf.org>, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVK9XWn+54iPCDrkuDZTG6qPlYTw==
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 04:15:50 +0000
Message-ID: <C3929573-4E77-45D2-8AE1-F5D070A3108F@cisco.com>
References: <155796191292.30544.5541464850362872029.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155796191292.30544.5541464850362872029.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.26.0.170902
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=dcmgash@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1008::12e]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: acb5be13-58d2-4a15-1888-08d6f9ecf913
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR11MB1257;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1257:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB125702EF2F45FB7A82CF1F7CB7E20@DM5PR11MB1257.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 00808B16F3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(346002)(376002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(51914003)(6506007)(486006)(102836004)(68736007)(86362001)(73956011)(305945005)(476003)(6246003)(6116002)(4326008)(46003)(33656002)(25786009)(14454004)(446003)(186003)(76176011)(478600001)(14444005)(2616005)(2906002)(99286004)(11346002)(71200400001)(966005)(256004)(71190400001)(53546011)(54906003)(316002)(58126008)(110136005)(91956017)(66476007)(66556008)(36756003)(64756008)(76116006)(53936002)(6306002)(8676002)(66446008)(6486002)(81156014)(6436002)(7736002)(229853002)(6512007)(66946007)(5660300002)(8936002)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB1257; H:DM5PR11MB1322.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: mIWPyQPwI3me5FyGzUPFsB8k6JoJ7oCWtOlm+fPP3fT+MRQbYDH4r8Lray6JyI35r6glfVt7DPRg6YnVNvvd/A0p7FxhYCKyxfJuR5w4RE5imqvfYBD6eyFNEYUrhb2Vw1K5OA8zycVFdmFgvfkXy8zwsdReCULk1mJkVc2l+FddQZZQ2ZQMrmdNaegU8829vC8Shbqe987FK3S6pxLI39wvjHhzttq0Mo4n7XyAMvsQqdY1z7gHYNbrG8mUY5I8dnzaUnLez3aAR7E+xMRdPy88TBgde/MsHbcAlYaSUzztdlHAuI1RRUJo3Byc4mGRPI/6VbVgct6DqRHjyy6jjuEk0V/goirDkwn1mR0IBoEaUSCFihk5PrI9AVzN/BXiUDyU5PwITnpZR1eu+YCoyeXnmtlcVEUf2ZINZLh3LbE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <124FDB7507AEA544A884729892A405D8@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: acb5be13-58d2-4a15-1888-08d6f9ecf913
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Jun 2019 04:15:50.4278 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: dcmgash@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1257
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.28, xch-rcd-018.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/AbxjJGAYz8E4sV-c5XfdHHoqzaE>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 04:15:58 -0000

Many thanks for the comments.

Please see responses from authors inline, marked “TA”. Action items from this mail to update the document are marked: [AI-TA] to mean: “action item for the authors”.

On 16/05/2019, 0:11, "Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

    Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    * Section 8.1.
    
    "IPV6 address text representation defined in RFC 4291 [RFC4291]"
    
    I would much prefer using RFC5952 here as it tightens rules a bit over RFC4291
    and cuts down the flexibility to make text comparisons easier.
TA> Agreed, will update [AI-TA]    

    "Stardate is canonically inconsistent and so SHOULD NOT be used."
    
    as in "Acting Captain's log, Stardate 2258.42. We have had no word from Captain
    Pike..."? I agree that it is canonically inconsistent but this will be very
    confusing for non-Trekkies. Is this really needed here?

TA> Agreed, will purge. [AI-TA]