Re: [OPSAWG] PLS request for time slots for presenting your drafts in OPSAWG mtg during IETF-80

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Scott and all, 

The rule that we had been following is that Internet-Drafts need to be
submitted and accessible in the I-D directory before the submission
deadline, so that they are available for interested attendees to access
them from a well-known place and prepare for the meeting. Of course
exceptions can be admitted sometimes, but they need to be exceptions. My
advice is to give priority to the items in the agenda that are backed by
Internet-Drafts properly submitted with the deadlines. If there is time
left at the end of the OPSAWG + OPSAREA meeting we can let room for
other items, as the OPSAREA agenda ends anyway with a open microphone
time slot. 

I would also recommend that each presenter focuses on explaining why the
respective document and work item is relevant for the scope of the
OPSAWG. We should assume that people have read the documents and that we
can focus on the discussion how relevant they are for the area and for
the WG (this is why we need the documents available in advance). 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott O. Bradner [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 1:05 PM
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]
> Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: PLS request for time slots for presenting your 
> drafts in OPSAWG mtg during IETF-80
> 
> humm - that looks like postings on a wiki not submission as 
> Internet Drafts and I do not find them in the Internet Drafts 
> directory
> 
> also they are not legit Internet Drafts names
> 
> my normal rule is not let anything on teh agenda whch was not 
> published as an Internet Draft
> 
> ADs - is this a new replacement for IDs that I've not heard about?
> 
> Scott
> 
>