[OPSAWG] Deborah Brungard's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13: (with COMMENT)
Deborah Brungard via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 14 May 2019 16:33 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588991201D5; Tue, 14 May 2019 09:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Deborah Brungard via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs@ietf.org, Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, jclarke@cisco.com, opsawg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.96.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com>
Message-ID: <155785161334.30214.9742358968370478777.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 09:33:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/AvuH7rXhyObSMe3IevE-3zZUBUc>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Deborah Brungard's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 16:33:44 -0000
Deborah Brungard has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- While the status is an Informational document, not PS, I still would prefer if earlier in the document it provided the reader with deployment concerns e.g. the introduction. The current introduction states a "wide range" of clients and servers are already deployed. Not until section 10 is the reader informed "Multiple implementations of the protocol described in the original TACACS+ Draft `The Draft' [TheDraft] have been deployed. As the protocol was never standardized, current implementations may be incompatible in non-obvious ways". And section 10.5 on Best Practices which has the new restriction that it not be deployed with other traffic. This information is needed much earlier in the document to give context for the reader.
- [OPSAWG] Deborah Brungard's No Objection on draft… Deborah Brungard via Datatracker
- Re: [OPSAWG] Deborah Brungard's No Objection on d… Douglas Gash (dcmgash)