[OPSAWG] Consensus on draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04?
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org> Tue, 14 February 2012 15:45 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C6E21F8754 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:45:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.396, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34t45qRlc3hn for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:45:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asgaard.org (odin.asgaard.org [204.29.151.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E666921F8769 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:45:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3679FB974D7; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:45:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at asgaard.org
Received: from asgaard.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (odin.asgaard.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oJlSk76h+cFi; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fenrir.asgaard.org (50-76-34-185-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.76.34.185]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0970B974BE; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:56 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_249D7D3F-23F2-4F17-B64F-B1C33F22B9EA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:14:39 -0800
Message-Id: <2BE690E1-84A1-40AB-9EBB-4FA55B2F884F@cdl.asgaard.org>
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] Consensus on draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04?
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:45:09 -0000
Greetings, I believe that I sent this out last week, but can't seem to find it - so here it is again.... The latest draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 is out and seems to have addressed all the outstanding issues. We have WGLC'd this twice. Instead of running this for a week, can we get anyone who has substantive issues with this draft to speak up in the next 48-72 hours? Say, by Wed night 23:59 UTC? If there are no comments, we will progress the document. Thank you, Chris -- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf
- [OPSAWG] Consensus on draft-ietf-opsawg-managemen… Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
- Re: [OPSAWG] Consensus on draft-ietf-opsawg-manag… Christopher LILJENSTOLPE