Re: [OPSAWG] Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011

Edward Beili <EdwardB@actelis.com> Tue, 14 January 2014 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <EdwardB@actelis.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30D71AE15E for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:34:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YTAepf6DrYV7 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.actelis.com (mail2.actelis.com [212.150.9.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0EF1AE142 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:34:08 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,658,1384293600"; d="scan'208,217";a="2463001"
Received: from unknown (HELO il-mail07.actelis.net) ([212.150.9.1]) by mail2.actelis.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2014 19:33:56 +0200
Received: from il-mail07.actelis.net ([10.0.0.60]) by il-mail07.actelis.net ([10.0.0.60]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:33:56 +0200
From: Edward Beili <EdwardB@actelis.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:33:54 +0200
Thread-Topic: Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011
Thread-Index: Ac8RSDBILHYdk+dQTwmfil5PniulqgABoJpw
Message-ID: <4087887712E5C648B9F72BB9D912FD4602F6D3A4EBFB@il-mail07.actelis.net>
References: <52D566F0.5030103@cisco.com> <4087887712E5C648B9F72BB9D912FD4602F6D3A4EBF8@il-mail07.actelis.net> <52D569E9.7030303@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52D569E9.7030303@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4087887712E5C648B9F72BB9D912FD4602F6D3A4EBFBilmail07act_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Pat Thaler <pthaler@broadcom.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:34:12 -0000

Say the 1st draft by Feb 9th?
Regards,
-E.

From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 18:47
To: Edward Beili
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Pat Thaler
Subject: Re: Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011

Ed,
Benoit,
I wouldn't call it focusing, but since I committed I would have to do it.
Thanks.  Any time estimation?

Regards, Benoit.
Thanks for reminding me.
Regards,
-E.

From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 18:34
To: Edward Beili
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Pat Thaler
Subject: Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011

Dear Ed,

The OPSAWG charter says:
(D) Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011.
Considering RFC 4663 "Transferring MIB Work from IETF Bridge MIB WG to IEEE
802.1 WG" as an reference, the following pieces of information would the
foundation for the document: a table mapping the old IETF MIB names with the
corresponding new IEEE ones, clarifications/rules on the IETF-IEEE interactions
(mailing lists, reviews), and clarifications on the intellectual property considerations.
If I remember correctly, you committed to work on this one.
With the approval of draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-07<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis/>, are you now focusing on this new work item?

Please let us know.

Regards, Benoit