[OPSAWG] request to publish draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-05
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org> Sun, 19 February 2012 10:37 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FEF21F858F; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:37:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UZrGg1KIca4s; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:37:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asgaard.org (odin.asgaard.org [204.29.151.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C4D21F8554; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:37:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9D0BD555A; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:37:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at asgaard.org
Received: from asgaard.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (odin.asgaard.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JveMw3PEQjYs; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:37:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fenrir.asgaard.org (50-76-34-185-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.76.34.185]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AD5BBD554C; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:37:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2AB84205-C7E5-4E7A-8148-8EC0C78D0BF4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:37:13 -0800
Message-Id: <6F447D79-F626-4F5D-BFF7-B47DB9FF9916@cdl.asgaard.org>
To: iesg-secretary@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds@tools.ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] request to publish draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-05
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:37:17 -0000
Greetings all, The Operations Area Working Group has reached consensus on draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 and are requesting it to be published as an RFC. The RFC 4858 questions/considerations are addressed below: 1a) I will be the shepherd and I have personally reviewed the document and believe it is ready 1b) There has been adequate review both in and out of the WG 1c) I have no concerns in general, nor specifically wrt to AAA, security, XML, etc. 1d) I have no concerns about the content, and no IPR considerations have been raised 1e) There is solid consensus 1f) There has been no extreme discontent 1g) All nit's nitted 1h) no normative references, only informative 1i) The IANA consideration section exists and is consistent 1k) The MIB definition in the document passes automated validation checkers (minus the XXX as a place-holder for the RFC number) Technical Summary This document gives an overview of the IETF network management standards and summarizes existing and ongoing development of IETF standards-track network management protocols and data models. The purpose of this document is on the one hand to help system developers and users to select appropriate standard management protocols and data models to address relevant management needs. On the other hand, the document can be used as an overview and guideline by other Standard Development Organizations or bodies planning to use IETF management technologies and data models. Working group summary: There was nothing noteworthy in the working group process Any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me in the first instance, or Scott and Melinda. Chris -- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf
- [OPSAWG] request to publish draft-ietf-opsawg-man… Christopher LILJENSTOLPE