Re: [OPSAWG] Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07

Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com> Fri, 21 September 2018 05:49 UTC

Return-Path: <shawn.emery@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0EC1292F1; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yS4TP_XJ9o41; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x143.google.com (mail-lf1-x143.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30B32128CF2; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x143.google.com with SMTP id t22-v6so667015lfb.7; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CLgdnYYHIvD/jK+cu6WdcNn7dd4RVPc3yq1SGmUuPMY=; b=N1T+nM7l/t0mYkKR+142Mep9zlb035qHmjpWIxDlic4OvwGGqESAh1Kx4fEk1ry6CH fey2dXZXFPuCgBV79oQeNrCs8qGcKcmHjB347BicYBOkWhpaDrWfIyw/AtAgI+uEx8+s +B+M51UhQFPfPHnylWw1uM63uBCroCT9+W7uJVSkPPsNE1cvevahWgP8EOOQkkaLeyjf 3L+Yh8TgtjSzZ+dv+ooKAYIyND6JTAcsUBPgUk4zdpCo1fx2Y8hfA6DKC3wJD+B5Tgan 2lqkOryE0fT2pXROlo9qw+l3IDjNYYcmMKTar7EWVvPbr/TUeGyTr4BuiOipyYgMdEGt Uk/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CLgdnYYHIvD/jK+cu6WdcNn7dd4RVPc3yq1SGmUuPMY=; b=eZeWQsJrKmhGld0CMl5OrEbRqJv6cOQgWlmkHd/FPqcSvXF1FF3V8q0HgmtSu8fIz5 umRzgpMBF8HKBpe3bsIwc/wJQh5cdyGFxN5y4ODWDpxo+k6nMEeYEjOr5PW9cOxQTuwA XhYcz1kkMxkvZg2GaoihBnOGZQ0BTy1WPAUL+6LRIxV9n0RfZhc4C1DCqm5JL90vHQgN DDJEP5M6lgNxyM2exe1g9Q+JWBQvjehvCuezEDYCA/k64X9weda3TeHq9VePDH70pYUc Z247WxOYZFhmSylaeeTEmwGRdAOfwhgBaZObiCv3Z6JmJjTyiTxRy4GLg1ker+GPe89u G3Gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BlcS60TD4imBi48KXgup1O20djTsGjb5Iqv1QXMbmFzKk8uoy7 AkokFKqbD/KEZT3uOOOgGhyFMiIXsx3Q6IxxmKQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZz7snXJSdFnCJdEbzrxOzRxFQ5hyyhzyFisazZv0xcGuVFpmSi/jW5CjsJADOeT08vP9aOwrVKyOY+iNFquFw=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:7112:: with SMTP id m18-v6mr19132186lfc.64.1537508938058; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChzXmbZaRmr5KqG33v_Oq=nxGtKZhkTxYLUg_JnJhKHrLOwiw@mail.gmail.com> <SG2PR06MB217016BC102E505BFA30DC97FC130@SG2PR06MB2170.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SG2PR06MB217016BC102E505BFA30DC97FC130@SG2PR06MB2170.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:48:47 -0600
Message-ID: <CAChzXmbPapgM3tNGR-96FqDm7viBMgrqTzLDEBZvHQBdp2cFag@mail.gmail.com>
To: li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@tools.ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000017992a05765b32a5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/EGyWdpKUDtHgmOGRcZsPYs3ip5U>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 05:49:03 -0000

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:31 AM li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Shawn M. Emery,
>
> Thank you for your review and nits. I have corrected all the nits and
> uploaded a new version -08. Please check and thanks again.
>

The updates look fine to me.  Thanks for your quick response.

Shawn.
-- 

> ------------------------------
> li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
>
>
> *From:* Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com>
> *Date:* 2018-09-19 15:03
> *To:* secdir <secdir@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all
> <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@tools.ietf.org>
> *CC:* Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07
>
> Reviewer: Shawn M. Emery
> Review result: Ready with numerous nits
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
> area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
> comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> This draft specifies new Information Elements (IEs) in order to support
> BGP community
> information for the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) protocol.
>
> The security considerations section does exist and states that the draft
> just defines
> new IEs and does not introduce any new security considerations.  The
> section then
> goes on to state that the same security issues that apply to the IPFIX
> protocol and
> the corresponding Information Model applies to this specification.  I
> agree with these
> assertions.
>
> General comments:
>
> None.
>
> Editorial comments:
>
> s/differnt/different/g
>
> s/Netwok/Network/
>
> s/statistic/statistics/
>
> s/mediator needs/the mediator needs/
>
> s/Mediator is/The mediator is/
>
> s/figure up/determine/g
>
> s/mechanisum/mechanism/
>
> s/generted/generated/
>
> s/Please refer/Please refer to/g
>
> s/originated from AS A and destinated/originating from AS A and destined/
>
> s/becuse it will cause the congestion/because it will cause congestion/
>
> s/togecher/together/
>
> s/source IP and destination IP/source and destination IP address/g
>
> s/both the source IP and the destination IP related/relating to both the source and destination IP addresses/
>
> s/length one IPFIX/length of one IPFIX/
>
> s/to the information about the networks in the field/to information about networks in the field/
>
>
> OLD:
>
> configure export policy of BGP communities on the exporter to limit the BGP communities to be exported, so as to only export some specific communities,or not to export some specific communities.
>
> NEW:
>
> configure the export policy of BGP communities to limit the BGP communities by including or excluding specific communities.
>
>
> s/The detailed mechanism is out of the scope of this document./The details of increasing IPFIX message length is out of scope for this document./
>
> s/refer Appendix A/refer to Appendix A/
>
> s/source or destination IP/source or destination IP address/
>
>
> Shawn.
>
> --
>
>