[OPSAWG] 回复: Re: I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt

"Chongfeng Xie" <xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn> Sat, 29 June 2019 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F6912001A for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 06:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cIcPy9ML8XP8 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 06:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.223]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815A5120019 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 06:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.218:34812.415517734
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-111.196.132.216 (unknown [172.18.0.218]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 04AEB280092; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 21:40:25 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from EHLO ip<111.196.132.216> ([172.18.0.218]) by App0025 with ESMTP id e586a1d6-b263-4574-95f8-bfe45105f5be for bill.wu@huawei.com; Sat Jun 29 21:40:28 2019
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.218
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 21:40:21 +0800
From: Chongfeng Xie <xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA49AB2A3@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 8, 379[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <201906292140086002223@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart217783550362_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/GicSOH_tQ66ky-EQsC3VTXFvU3w>
Subject: [OPSAWG] 回复: Re: I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:40:39 -0000

Hi,  
Firstly, I support the progression of this draft, which gives a architecture of how to make multiple models work together to meet service provioning automatically.  In addition, I have the following comments,

1) As one type of model in the framework, network resource model should be given a definition or illustration in section 2.1.2. Personally, I think more focus should be given to the framework itself, the series of models can be taken as examples.

2)  In section 3.1,there is the following text   "The IETF has developed a number of service level, network level and device level modules.  Different service level modules may rely on the same set of network level or device level modules.  Service level modules usually follow top down approach and are mostly customer-facing models providing a common model construct for higher level network services, which can be further mapped to network technology-specific models at lower layer.“”

    It seems that this talk about the backgound of this architecture, if so, it is better to move it to the first section 1 of this draft.


Chongfeng



 
发件人: Qin Wu
发送时间: 2019-06-24 14:43
收件人: Tianran Zhou; opsawg@ietf.org
主题: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Tianran Zhou 
发送时间: 2019年6月24日 10:35
收件人: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org
主题: RE: I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
 
 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qin Wu
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 11:47 AM
> To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: I-D Action:
> draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> 
> Hi, Tianran:
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Tianran Zhou
> 发送时间: 2019年6月21日 11:11
> 收件人: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org
> 主题: RE: I-D Action:
> draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> 
> Hi Qin and the authors,
> 
> I think this is a valuable work as a comprehensive thinking on the 
> model driven work in IETF.
> I am very interested on the architecture, the classification, the 
> mapping methodology, etc.
> 
> Some points may be useful:
> 1. When I am looking at the " Figure 1: An overview of IETF YANG 
> Modules", I think it's better not to list the specific models in "Network Service Models".
> Or you can use for example. Otherwise people may think those are the 
> only considered service models in IETF.
> [Qin]: Fair point, I intend to use them as example modules and will 
> make this clear in the figure 1, e.g., add "etc" for each category of models.
> 
> 
> 2. While I think it's really good to investigate "all" the current 
> models in IETF, you may not need to list them in the main content. You 
> can keep the classification, the introduction to each category, the 
> inter-connectivity description. But I suggest to move the 
> "document:introduction" to the appendix. As you mentioned, the 
> document identifies a comprehensive list of modules to exemplify the 
> proposed approach, but the document does not claim to be exhaustive. The list may keep exploding and make the document not stable.
> 
> [Qin]: The rationale behind is first list what model does IETF have on 
> the table and then discuss how these models are put together, move 
> model introductions to appendix may make people feel disconnected, in 
> my personal view. Yes, we have statement to say we are not intending 
> to enumerate all IETF defined YANG models. We can add a few text in 
> each section title to say the models listed here are just examples. 
> One example such section title could
> be:
> "2.1.1.  Network Service Models: Definition and Samples".
> Does this address your concern?
 
Hi Qin,
 
I am OK with this modification. This makes the draft more clear.
Maybe, a better way is to state only your perspective and conclusion in the main content. The examples, from my perspective, are support material. I am afraid they will affect people to focus on your points, especially when you give each one model an abstract. 
But this is trivial compared to your work have done in the draft. :-)
 
Cheers,
Tianran
 
[Qin]: Thanks, Tianran, point taken.
 
> More comments will come later.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tianran
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 10:38 AM
> > To: opsawg@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action:
> > draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> >
> > Hi, Folks:
> > We have submitted an v-04 of
> > draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization based on feedback on 
> > the ML and last IETF meeting discussion 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wu-model-driven-manageme
> > nt
> > -v
> > irtualization-04
> > And would like to solicit more feedback on this draft.
> >
> > The goal of this draft is to discuss how top down top down built 
> > model (e.g., customer-facing data models) interact with bottom up 
> > built model (network resource-facing data models) in the context of 
> > service delivery and assurance.
> >
> > The document identifies a comprehensive list of modules to exemplify 
> > the proposed approach, but the document does not claim to be exhaustive.
> >
> > Further Comments, suggestions, input are welcome.
> >
> > -Qin (on behalf of coauthors)
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表
> > internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > 发送时间: 2019年6月19日 20:14
> > 收件人: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> > 主题: I-D Action:
> draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> > directories.
> >
> >
> >         Title           : A Framework for Automating Service and Network
> > Management with YANG
> >         Authors         : Qin Wu
> >                           Mohamed Boucadair
> >                           Young Lee
> > Filename        :
> > draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> > Pages           : 37
> > Date            : 2019-06-19
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    Model-driven service and network management provides a programmatic
> >    and standard-based approach for representing (virtual) services or
> >    networks and configuration to the network device that are used to
> >    build and deliver the service.  Models can be used at various phases
> >    of service and network management life cycle such as service
> >    instantiation, service provisionning, optimization, monitoring, and
> >    diagnostic.  Also, models can be designed to automate network
> >    management and provide closed-loop control for the sake of adaptive
> >    and deterministic service creation, delivery, and maintenance.
> >
> >    This document provides a framework that describes and discusses an
> >    architecture for service and network management automation with YANG
> >    modeling technologies.  An applicability of YANG data models to
> >    automation of virtualized network service is also investigated.
> >
> >    The document aims to exemplify an approach to illustrate the journey
> >    from technology-agnostic services to technology-specific actions.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-model-driven-management-vi
> > rt
> > ua
> > lization/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtual
> > iz
> > at
> > ion-04
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wu-model-driven-manageme
> > nt
> > -v
> > irtualization-04
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wu-model-driven-management-v
> > ir
> > tu
> > alization-04
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > I-D-Announce mailing list
> > I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or 
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> > _______________________________________________
> > OPSAWG mailing list
> > OPSAWG@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg