Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16: (with COMMENT)

[<[e-mail]>]

Hi Benjamin, 

FWIW, I submitted a new version (-17) addressing your comments: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-17 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Envoyé : mardi 25 septembre 2018 23:49
> À : Benjamin Kaduk
> Cc : The IESG; [e-mail]; Joe Clarke; opsawg-
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Objet : RE: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Re-,
> 
> Removed the duplicate hold-down text.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Envoyé : mardi 25 septembre 2018 23:45
> > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN
> > Cc : The IESG; [e-mail]; Joe Clarke; opsawg-
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Objet : Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16:
> > (with COMMENT)
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 09:41:32PM +0000, [e-mail]
> wrote:
> > > Re-,
> > >
> > > Please see inline.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Med
> > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > > Envoyé : mardi 25 septembre 2018 23:35
> > > > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN
> > > > Cc : The IESG; [e-mail]; Joe Clarke; opsawg-
> > > > [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > > > Objet : Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-
> yang-
> > 16:
> > > > (with COMMENT)
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 09:27:08PM +0000, [e-mail]
> > wrote:
> > > > > Hi Benjamin,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for the comments.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please see inline.
> > > >
> > > > Also inline.
> > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Med
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > > > De : Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > > > > Envoyé : mardi 25 septembre 2018 20:31
> > > > > > À : The IESG
> > > > > > Cc : [e-mail]; Joe Clarke; opsawg-
> > > > [e-mail];
> > > > > > [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > > > > > Objet : Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-
> yang-
> > 16:
> > > > (with
> > > > > > COMMENT)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> > > > > > draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16: No Objection
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> all
> > > > > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > this
> > > > > > introductory paragraph, however.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
> > criteria.html
> > > > > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > -
> > > > > > COMMENT:
> > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > -
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the easy-to-read document!  I just have a few comments
> and
> > > > > > potential nits
> > > > > > I noticed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It was somewhat interesting to me that basically everything is
> config
> > rw,
> > > > > > including ports and
> > > > > > addresses that would normally be assigned internally by the NAT,
> but
> > I
> > > > don't
> > > > > > see this as
> > > > > > problematic.
> > > > >
> > > > > [Med] This is a good point. Actually, we are using rw because the
> same
> > > > structure is also used for static mappings. That is, the external port
> > and IP
> > > > address are also provided.
> > > >
> > > > I had even internalized that, just somehow didn't make the connection