IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16: (with COMMENT)

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Wed, 26 September 2018 04:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD46130DC2; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vn91_LPkm5td; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta136.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CE52126DBF; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr05.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.69]) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 42Klmm3lcjz4x24; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 06:47:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.75]) by opfednr05.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 42Klmm2zRNzyQF; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 06:47:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 06:47:52 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUVUvWcuZ2oirqJ0yqU3sn6Z4AmKUB+3xA
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 04:47:51 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFE6C42@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <153793372257.13126.527228740520268570.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <153793372257.13126.527228740520268570.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/IGh5Teg2o3TRKM--_OfZKdpVcmE>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 04:47:57 -0000

Hi Suresh, 

Adding that default value would make sense if port restriction is only reserved to NATs deployed in combination with MAP-E BRs. The document does not make that assumption.

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Suresh Krishnan
> Envoyé : mercredi 26 septembre 2018 05:49
> À : The IESG
> Cc : opsawg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org; opsawg-
> chairs@ietf.org
> Objet : [OPSAWG] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-
> yang-16: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Shouldn't the "psid-offset" have a default value of 6 for the 'a' bits in
> MAP-E?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email