[OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Thu, 24 September 2020 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6461A3A0489; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8pi_4Aag52SN; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A0903A0484; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EE8994D3C548EFA945EF; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:38:33 +0100 (IST)
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:38:32 +0100
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ( by nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:38:30 +0800
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ([]) by nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:38:30 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
Thread-Index: AdaSPP9orIcydBuASU6vliZgCPjT/w==
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:38:30 +0000
Message-ID: <d5d0ea857305431893f72e1d442d47cc@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_d5d0ea857305431893f72e1d442d47cchuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/KShheY8jd3vIYUbUJOnhpMT1ptA>
Subject: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:38:37 -0000

Sorry for attaching a wrong link to the draft. Please see as follows.

Hi WG,

This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf.


Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are welcome.

The WG LC will end on 9st Oct 2020.