Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

Adrian Farrel <> Mon, 01 February 2021 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D3D3A0CEF; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 02:22:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzmifvsnmF32; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 02:22:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A002D3A0CED; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 02:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 111AM8t5021580; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:22:08 GMT
Received: from (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FC022046; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:22:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BA322042; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:22:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 111AM6M1002057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:22:07 GMT
Reply-To: <>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <>
To: <>
Cc: <>, <>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:22:07 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <06bf01d6f884$18acfd10$4a06f730$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_06C0_01D6F884.18AD7240"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: Adb4g47mMCvNPbYGQ/2FgP+Wf4yHvg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--22.161-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--22.161-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--22.161200-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: cxtZ8fwm3r/xIbpQ8BhdbDjNGpWCIvfTvD4YKo9Sttxpifu1ea0XMz2j /N8mMgrkxrfONsogrDVUAbEDylQzMQWjWKO5zae3vOAv94sAIMRwm7Nn/lGhVl71b3cyy2Bj8z7 0XDTUjsYgULVmR42PvY2BVU96EdDes5jhQML4oXPJ/bVh4iw9hukphWnlDPb3pF5rzBQB1DqZOa IZKkI1NMSn3Mnad3/3wh79z3yYcR1rLYf5UBryJS0x8J2DopENV0QSZ/pNFUGJ20QSqQSR7W16M ylS17KBc5PwAJKZp4kVaMexavIhFJsO9o0mINopqhcdnP91eXE8/9bDwLOgR1+oWJ54ylfsiGrx MMmDLfzv3i9bYKVkTkmlX2scVfePszCdMqCRuw7BtFDYGmaWKtoKfgOoKJc2tjNcLEm7a5H3SJv EvhvPoKS+xiE3BsxjT5TVrzzFxZDwgxb12RZmMsKVNVkgZd/IVOLMRauooBFq5aiUaVUyIFHXxC nNdK1OcvrjvvwFv2aZkBNENvTB36PBrriYr6d5x8D2frKhq7nQevMKEpazy5IC4CO/S0X+5GpAD FtYP37i8zVgXoAlttVnSDvjSUv5BLPx9cDMrKYrN8z0HohG3kUYJ3RLQ0Ky/bqBKH2HvnJOyJ/+ 3YDsYrmTfcm57zOVbaRVXe9ZJ2JoBmTSwRxjXg==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:22:13 -0000



Is it too late to ask for some privacy considerations to be added to this document?


My initial thought was that the authors would point me to 8805, but a quick look there doesn’t show any mention of privacy.


My concern here is that the end-user’s geographic locale is being exposed to the service provider without the agreement of the end-user, and without the end-user even knowing that it is happening.


I know that this information has great value for a number of aspects of service provision (not least geographic licensing), and I am not opposed to its availability. I do object, however, to the concept that a user’s locale is generally available. A user should have the option of not revealing their locale (in the knowledge that this may exclude them from accessing some services).


Now, I doubt that this document is the right place to fix these privacy concerns. But it might be a good place to add a short paragraph on the privacy issues raised by using geo feeds.