IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OPSAWG] 回复: RE: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06

li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB6E126BF7; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 02:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.785
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWNfJYHYBy09; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 02:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092255073.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.255.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C954124C27; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 02:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=RdpdrxxxLIyICRu7sWuzZmrOWCKgij48k9ISOnH+FU0=; b=P8QaJTx/ou7lHUd4iCsIVat0LFqhw4noDeUUCOxfFHVyMw8W2NmXAZ+Az0AzZiUmsEC/eKUHDLpCgz7NiEWN5g7MEWvM/okXUsXzLsfzZGze98+XWzyKH37swJ1Q3ATTuLwQP+DEwTToW5BWQsGJD3pzpIaXUnqhbOhRhbmLJ1PblSpQyUkdO75/rLyMeknCjmG63O1XIWUzSTexEG5O7L6PDGU+NVpiIo0OljsjNmUAglY8cZSoApSGHUA5vCcka+Ta1MUW3BmIVtO9usgqNAsQnCVuIM/j5cFE/6wqbuxvegsBRwTIMWeYTeybRyy6bt9pqLdnVf2VCz5XqgglKA==
Received: from PU1APC01FT112.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.56) by PU1APC01HT095.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.253.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.675.14; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:14:10 +0000
Received: from SINPR0601MB1805.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.152.252.55) by PU1APC01FT112.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.234) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.675.14 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:14:10 +0000
Received: from SINPR0601MB1805.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2d0a:c00e:4651:d091]) by SINPR0601MB1805.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2d0a:c00e:4651:d091%16]) with mapi id 15.20.0675.015; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:14:10 +0000
From: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
To: Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RE: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06
Thread-Index: AQHT1MloTciQIhK0/ESu+vkwx6HGlQ==
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:14:09 +0000
Message-ID: <SINPR0601MB18056406ADDD40B5AEF9ABCBFCB50@SINPR0601MB1805.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <152363066886.26321.3212300538180273898@ietfa.amsl.com>, <HKXPR0601MB1799868866AF89F9699EAF28FCB10@HKXPR0601MB1799.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>, <20180415160956.GC66082@shrubbery.net>, <ace47a71-0e9d-6a0d-ae37-1f4bc48ada0b@stevecrocker.com>, <20180416232930.GB47095@shrubbery.net>, <20180417154859.GA59765@shrubbery.net>, <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A6D64432@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:C7EE53EEC8B7735B6EE03D0523729DA2465684D68BD27B6937DD2F0BE4BD3E88; UpperCasedChecksum:0A3E4F5C5514ED31AB1F431163C7D3E5B72C9C721D1D83D0877432D3DEAE935A; SizeAsReceived:7634; Count:45
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [CQKKSIpXjq3tba/Z/d2NUtNxwRkqLRmE]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; PU1APC01HT095; 7:OgjIyzKE5NyvUvsgCo0BUJwKxr5RQqznWW8YAIJ+IRzrdrTUONrgcn8altsPo8A8JKxbORegwbffes9kqYOfAg1w3NzAoKNi5OvqJKhJQHNfmpt4xQBcpz04g7HaZx8hiCwDNZ/+9UvKKNR+LTgFJKOmgTlCNEA2YHdZuPnm6w5bCEoXKmXX2l1sBXNQFtkqzhZDBw3DdQ8g0FhJ8uANuM7rISPt5yTxBwSmLS5EkGdIdT92pXF0G+aXjdz9DZkW
x-incomingheadercount: 45
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:PU1APC01HT095;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PU1APC01HT095:
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:PU1APC01HT095; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:PU1APC01HT095;
x-forefront-prvs: 0647963F84
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:PU1APC01HT095; H:SINPR0601MB1805.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AR3phW87Sy613+H3V2JIaBVBc6BVf0jJgHOQCbc5F+lPxusH4ZLUWc7hRvnYzIvDAH5qZjFCGFrvMpsnCnqwzVeSkeN8rlVkiDQ7JM8BC430uxA+IDHeZf1YfkDVV07T4yEH8wc7s2Ocr7/3uAA1f+YZBYDcyyIdgNLC4oqkf1eN7Dbb1YCqxsdxDK31c226
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SINPR0601MB18056406ADDD40B5AEF9ABCBFCB50SINPR0601MB1805_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: f6d6812f-b5f4-4f51-80b3-08d5a5d5e856
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 24fd1209-d934-423e-a578-ee886993c07f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f6d6812f-b5f4-4f51-80b3-08d5a5d5e856
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 24fd1209-d934-423e-a578-ee886993c07f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Apr 2018 09:14:10.0831 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PU1APC01HT095
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/Lgesacdgj_q7m8kq1vrEVLWJw-s>
Subject: [OPSAWG] 回复: RE: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:14:15 -0000

Hello All,

We have updated the IPR Disclosures. The application number is given. At present the IPR that MAY relate to this draft is a patent application in China.

I have to say that we do the IPR Disclosures following the IETF IPR rules and procedures.  We think the disclosed patent application MAY relate to this draft, so we did the IPR disclosures. Whether or not it is really related to this draft depends on the lawyer's judgement.


Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
________________________________
li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com

发件人： Tianran Zhou<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>
发送时间： 2018-04-18 07:00
收件人： heasley<mailto:heas@shrubbery.net>; li zhenqiang<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>; draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all<mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org>; opsawg<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
主题： RE: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06
I think it worth the authors can discuss about this IPR in the WG before sending the draft to IESG.

Tianran


________________________________
Sent from WeLink

发件人： heasley
收件人： li zhenqiang<li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>>;rtg-dir<rtg-dir@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>>;gen-art<gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>>;draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all<draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org>>;ietf<ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>>;opsawg<opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>
主题： Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06
时间： 2018-04-17 23:49:16

Why is there IPR on this draft?  Is this because of section 3?  A section
that is unnecessary and could be entirely removed without affecting the
draft in any manner?

Otherwise, I think it absolutely absurd that there is IPR on this document.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email