From wes@mti-systems.com Tue Jan 16 12:20:33 2024 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A70C1516E2 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:20:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id smBSQKenL0w2 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:20:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 137E6C1516E1 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:20:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7833a51a1aaso582729385a.0 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:20:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1705436432; x=1706041232; darn=ietf.org; h=in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gNfIIgVKjnCezg/bGhGOvNpU60gpviZKkQzUEC8K8b4=; b=IRYbJvC4pZgnTQeGbmKf+Cnzlx/Z/R0t5UKSLiBgAMTg57iUdAAEcr+DChsV+zgJLP 5Rw2iY7gGD0nezawDJTUOe5oRdmN01wRw6TtuENa8edewSmfPAwCvQ0jV8XIb1zfecQg 63m/sYIhVXss274SeFVLR6APHJQEBzuXa4NXlMjm6eOtWv8Vqqejw2K+byMPyXM7i+Ww ZgK8sbuSEOvsaXmdYTN6MQfNM/8SxDAvgBlv8DUa9h77d5qCxPGgkXkWjEweSwmBRo4e RSG2mwCwM4D1z+Jv4hxn+2qLEJnY2LKJKFOTbY5SjEksJMbA/IZypwqHI9zG4cAlfSml 1jMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705436432; x=1706041232; h=in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gNfIIgVKjnCezg/bGhGOvNpU60gpviZKkQzUEC8K8b4=; b=pJWPMGdZZkDfEsAs1XKv5jMaxOp5mw03FmOPT/vPRnULfE2RYADhT/9txD/cPGs+dl hnmxz4woFf29HIUUCB/JxrDSm3LN77/M54fRRqkoEJ2to7Y+HxFQzHFN0qzJX+ehbqX7 7y04tD2SwzoaJvWAt1J8Vgj/qLs21QaDV0PkNLT6evnMYvrHSVbBUlmFhVM+iMLPJtSs LJrOeYR2xqiXLuI+zmFU0z8HrMDdAIva77KKMdzp28mkoeQVq/Es5FJ7JtG1xdl/POeT HEKYPygUxxDZ/E2o147VaSExhwtvALJrHmlOB+Ayfd/tb7yQhf6LMX+WXqGGvMHuHBxf aKDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzZWXULgT88cdQ+ayr55NnsbBZo13gw8k/OvWv9Jcn2CscaVUHb FtjMWf7sNnVA52qPYmJ0vZVWwAVvJswP6f7HJiBPPaf1qjLaxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFBqQ/aaFtc6r0oOvu2LaHLNrC5gDnIMHjROELK4Ym6RV5V0t+2EDw7InSICgsD38stDv3Rbg== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e292:0:b0:681:34f3:f732 with SMTP id r18-20020a0ce292000000b0068134f3f732mr7921628qvl.126.1705436431895; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:20:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (069-135-001-122.biz.spectrum.com. [69.135.1.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i20-20020a0cab54000000b00680c8115a43sm4566771qvb.36.2024.01.16.12.20.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:20:31 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------akdjXwjF5BEjdLN4wbn9yjt2" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:20:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, "tsv-art@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.all@ietf.org" , "opsawg@ietf.org" References: <170421960173.20693.6271938298987993574@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Wesley Eddy In-Reply-To: Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-05 X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:20:33 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------akdjXwjF5BEjdLN4wbn9yjt2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 1/16/2024 11:10 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: > > Are you expecting the implementation to have an exhaustive list of all > of the ExIDs in use to understand the difference between 2 and 4 byte > usage? > > */[Med] Yes because otherwise an implem can’t unambiguously identify > and extract ExIDs. We do provide a pointer to the registered ExIDs:/* > > *//* > > */==/* > > Additional Information:  See assigned ExIDs at [IANA-TCP-EXIDs]. > > */== /* > > *//* > > */Please let me know if you still think a clarification is needed to > the draft. Thanks./* > New ExIDs are able to be added to the IANA registry at any time, just via requesting them.  Is an IPFIX implementation expected to periodically fetch the registry and reload its known values? --------------akdjXwjF5BEjdLN4wbn9yjt2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 1/16/2024 11:10 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:

Are you expecting the implementation to have an exhaustive list of all of the ExIDs in use to understand the difference between 2 and 4 byte usage?

[Med] Yes because otherwise an implem can’t unambiguously identify and extract ExIDs. We do provide a pointer to the registered ExIDs:

 

==

Additional Information:  See assigned ExIDs at [IANA-TCP-EXIDs].

==

 

Please let me know if you still think a clarification is needed to the draft. Thanks.

New ExIDs are able to be added to the IANA registry at any time, just via requesting them.  Is an IPFIX implementation expected to periodically fetch the registry and reload its known values?




--------------akdjXwjF5BEjdLN4wbn9yjt2--