Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F12C14F71D for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 04:17:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.447 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.455, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IZWEcUH0g4x0 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 04:17:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB2F9C14F711 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 04:17:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4YTP086R1tz67MLY for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:16:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500003.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.28]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68F2140A79 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:17:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.94) by frapeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:17:35 +0100 Received: from frapeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.94]) by frapeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.94]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:17:35 +0100 From: Zhuoyao Lin To: "opsawg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: WG LAST CALL: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data Thread-Index: AQHbQNkrLsh+mbrXKkWI9L3CHCGFObMKJ621gAGtJ2A= Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:17:35 +0000 Message-ID: <81a2bcb1e33d4b80ae2b877d4e2ab433@huawei-partners.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.206.138.201] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_81a2bcb1e33d4b80ae2b877d4e2ab433huaweipartnerscom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: HIYB4LTG6WBJLYMXYDMKPYMXBQEOKDBM X-Message-ID-Hash: HIYB4LTG6WBJLYMXYDMKPYMXBQEOKDBM X-MailFrom: zhuoyao.lin1@huawei-partners.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-opsawg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BOPSAWG=5DRe=3A_WG_LAST_CALL=3A_A_Data_Manifest_for_Contextualiz?= =?utf-8?q?ed_Telemetry_Data?= List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --_000_81a2bcb1e33d4b80ae2b877d4e2ab433huaweipartnerscom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear authors and OPSAWG, I have reviewed the draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05 but the us= age of yang-library is still a bit unclear to me. 1. In Section 3.1, it states: "That module set is particularly useful to analyze the xpath filters, as they are based on module names (see [RFC8639], p= age 47)." I am trying to understand what type of usage of xpath it is = talking about here? Maybe it is worth to put the explanation in the Section= 1.1 Use cases? 1. Still in section 3.1, it states: "The Platform Manifest is obtained by specifying the new= fields defined above and mounting the YANG library module, along with the YANG Revisions augmentations." I can't find the YANG revision augmentations in the module. Is it talking a= bout the semantic revision here or only the revision for the YANG module? I= f it is the former, the related draft should be cited. However, I believe the draft is pretty complete in terms of providing the m= etadata for performing telemetry. Therefore I would like to support the ado= ption of this draft. Best regards, Zhuoyao Lin From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 4:08 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telem= etry Data Happy New Year, WG. Because of the holidays I didn't get a chance to offic= ially close this in time. However, we did not get any WGLC feedback during= the window. Only yesterday did some substantive feedback come from Alex (= thanks!). As such, we are going to conduct another WGLC now that the holiday cycle is= behind us. We'll consider Alex's comments as part of that. This begins a second WGLC to run until January 20. Please provide all comm= ents (including a "yay" if you feel it is ready) on the mailing list. Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) > Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2024 at 09:39 To: opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: WG LAST CALL: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data Hello, WG (and a Happy Thanksgiving to those of you in the US). With the I= PR poll concluded (no IPR has been reported), we'd like to kick off a two w= eek WG LC on draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest. Please review this draft and provide comments on-list. If you feel this dr= aft is ready for publication, please respond as such on-list. We will kick= off DIR reviews with OPS and YANG docs to get a couple more eyes on it. W= e are also in need of a shepherd for this document. If you are interested,= please let the chairs know. The WG LC will conclude on December 11. Joe --_000_81a2bcb1e33d4b80ae2b877d4e2ab433huaweipartnerscom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear authors and OPSAWG,

 

I have reviewed the draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05 but= the usage of yang-library is still a bit unclear to me.<= /p>

 

  1. In  S= ection 3.1, it states:
  =
;            &n=
bsp;    "That module set is particularly useful =
to analyze the

         xpath filters,= as they are based on module names (see [RFC8639], page

        47).”

           &n= bsp;   I am trying to understand what type of usage of xpath it i= s talking about here? Maybe it is worth to put the explanation in the Secti= on 1.1 Use cases?

 

  1. Still in s= ection 3.1, it states:
  =
;            &n=
bsp;    “The Platform Manifest is obtained by s=
pecifying the new fields
        defined above and mounting the Y=
ANG library module, along with the
        YANG Revisions augmentations.=
221;

I can’t find the YANG revision augmentations in the mod= ule. Is it talking about the semantic revision here or only the revision fo= r the YANG module? If it is the former, the related draft should be cited.

 

 

However, I believe the draft is pretty complete in terms of providin= g the metadata for performing telemetry. Therefore I would like to support = the adoption of this draft.

 

Best regards,

Zhuoyao Lin

 

 

 

From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=3D40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>= ;
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 4:08 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: A Data Manifest for Contextualize= d Telemetry Data

 

Happy New Year, WG.  Because of the holidays I = didn’t get a chance to officially close this in time.  However, = we did not get any WGLC feedback during the window.  Only yesterday di= d some substantive feedback come from Alex (thanks!).

 

As such, we are going to conduct another WGLC now th= at the holiday cycle is behind us.  We’ll consider Alex’s = comments as part of that.

 

This begins a second WGLC to run until January 20.&n= bsp; Please provide all comments (including a “yay” if you feel= it is ready) on the mailing list.

 

Joe

 

From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke@cisc= o.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2024 at 09:39
To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: WG LAST CALL: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry = Data

Hello, WG (and a Happy Th= anksgiving to those of you in the US).  With the IPR poll concluded (n= o IPR has been reported), we’d like to kick off a two week WG LC on draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest.

 

Please review this draft = and provide comments on-list.  If you feel this draft is ready for pub= lication, please respond as such on-list.  We will kick off DIR review= s with OPS and YANG docs to get a couple more eyes on it.  We are also in need of a shepherd for this document.&nbs= p; If you are interested, please let the chairs know.

 

The WG LC will conclude o= n December 11.

 

Joe

--_000_81a2bcb1e33d4b80ae2b877d4e2ab433huaweipartnerscom_--