Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs is approved.

"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com> Thu, 19 March 2020 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2439B3A0C6C; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=I920iviM; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=jhpziy7e
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMpq2_uVQq1Q; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AB453A0C6B; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1037; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1584640255; x=1585849855; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=iSBgWspJNaO74q6AXB7vaFFGUUNjOOhksrIL/xWt+Ao=; b=I920iviMPDJ1csH+p8sk1FsES2lS+oOwST6uPc40MCz/Y8L3WWPCL1+l kOs3FQSdupK76811iQL4LFJeqfI5yKnC+Wrp+OSYmvo6Jw12qsFIwOSIU yank4t/m/UjfjZ4eJsqJFYrTk5PAEclDr5ceYKz5g+oyiH6QTRoDfv1+g E=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:Z8i6ER/trQ+1hv9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+8ZB7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVcyODUThL/PCZC0hF8MEX1hgrDm2
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CKBQAlsHNe/4kNJK1mHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgXuBVFAFgUQgBAsqh1sDim+COiWYGIJSA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIEAQGEQwKCGyQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FVgyFYwEBAQECARIoBgEBNwEECwIBCBgeEDIlAgQOBRoIgwSCSwMOIAGiPQKBOYhigieCfwEBBYJFgkIYggwJgTiMLxqBQT+BOAwUgk0+hEuDQ4IssEcKgjyWeh2bS6pnAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFYcBVlAYJBUBgNjh2Dc4pVdIEpjX0BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,572,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="741834487"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 19 Mar 2020 17:50:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02JHosFg003396 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:50:54 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:50:54 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:50:53 -0500
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:50:53 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=TrNANNGsT4vg9G72Pv2QGUifAIrGC7Zx3Rdq03W7PlfzpiNl53KI081CquurJnkSvS+GKG/5/Zrt3WkBz2TGw8DhqiAdrOMub3TAPKqfnkTOIAEPMvmq+ZtyV0sO8G9PmLhbNenHrcvni7LYK/yudwQK7YktibRPjmEk5QOTuyVkVjwI6EdEDtlkpktDIDVhvaHNKoIyNeMZE3hkRNeTK+gC1erJBLdTJGT0au0nRR7lCFhaxlzxTOSAId7VYcqVTT7jYCB/eGMN/+XEIXVxIxhsF+EQFa0myWh9cjuH52Nn97+DqmqitjiUWk6Kw6L1zFSLhDr1Wd0pAMrhlu4F8A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=3t/uwiopaL5fwPoaKXN2G9wOQt6qFhFXJUAo9wl5LEo=; b=Cegr8Ev2zZSYguOPIjj3NC24Nhb5JA7cH1ye9HUPHcU4Ur8TFQCwPU7mlMTebRSkRB3d7aluYJAJe/Ag4KVpZ4H8ZhF+ilhGRDhIBZumZE+/2IJuVeNccWKWpdD3Lrp8wL1M24MFCOxFiEqcnCc8sJ2l/2WHdOwQw5MwETX0mTiGe9vjHXDPiKvgrY2JdoB6b5E2UL9KGC2NVo5BfhGwtmLPhap4knr3U42GqKwCzHF6No0/DwGREWrRn2HBPLFGK2iydQy4EY8jxt4ljZ+fiEQe4H13pdwLuwhLBqusOYu7/SakGaK34T+ZRGfog9rk2PdSOUfPi5b9g/0gS/jFdQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3t/uwiopaL5fwPoaKXN2G9wOQt6qFhFXJUAo9wl5LEo=; b=jhpziy7eyFAwAuKNHeXYLxF1ikwSiVL1lFM8Jl439ZgHWyE4SRfySNCZj4bG7THm/kPNlqWpNZvS55xZWp2jot22FGoXpg9rscAjZ2Nt2npZl2xMimO/n5FWYURU1KLCEkFbdiy/r5jGzWLYvacawZgJfM30fHLYki/T9WZ0qM0=
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:e::12) by BN6PR11MB1697.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:41::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2814.14; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:50:53 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9dc8:a67:89cd:a2d2]) by BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9dc8:a67:89cd:a2d2%12]) with mapi id 15.20.2814.021; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:50:52 +0000
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
CC: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, OpsAWG-Chairs <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs is approved.
Thread-Index: AQHV/hX879xQvlIhg0i7zEKRlLa816hQMa+A
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:50:52 +0000
Message-ID: <11910783-228C-40DD-B125-4525A2E7FFEF@cisco.com>
References: <CAHw9_iK16SGu82jW7WC+kYU9woBBSk+G2Eaq2ojSbWqbKLpyqw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iK16SGu82jW7WC+kYU9woBBSk+G2Eaq2ojSbWqbKLpyqw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jclarke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1004::511]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4a583a89-9d5d-47f5-aea9-08d7cc2e1172
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB1697:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB1697C050E02F261DA5AAC881B8F40@BN6PR11MB1697.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0347410860
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(396003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(199004)(66946007)(66556008)(64756008)(4744005)(36756003)(6916009)(316002)(33656002)(6486002)(8936002)(8676002)(81166006)(81156014)(86362001)(54906003)(5660300002)(66476007)(76116006)(71200400001)(66446008)(186003)(6512007)(2616005)(2906002)(91956017)(6506007)(4326008)(53546011)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR11MB1697; H:BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: TZu2NfvFkul4krTUZUdSDVOumfpbiRavB7GBNVJrMSQJMbEi0yNHBqtH88/m4oTiNj/cvJWt/xdnDBwCxme9HYIE/OwzCWuWnqrnJVHsOfCqbJSQ2BgPLZ1QzVqOFzUwV8e6NpT3BsSnfSO1Xnp+fgYQj14NS6+vj7qs5QrASrfsimwuTwkYGelNgNymvulqkj2tvSDTS/ATf8lX3LkangesSxgGvT8ljqfghrmCA1ors3ZmaIgj+9Hahtv2zNbn4wo2QNvrUk2SGqB4uidJ4sV2m3ysQBj3nxYzElmd0vxbHvig4tdw5XniUttgkoDFqTHcQ8o7OP2sRRw5sYBdXAZWGo/5L+ZAJoPlVub4Mu+RYSuwbvIzZabKQXqZ0+CR9y2y4DHeUuJ2LWHuL6QEg9uVLLHKr3mfkGlRtGunt5lnegJNUrnDh4hU4FV18uIb
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: q7WdrvGMVXNFf+aKQrMLJFhGV0dw8ksKGfWGgk0gycUAi6VmEtV+OFFLMz2r25ad8SFVEoUV70N9dDKto+RWTvRrv616pizVkXhihb3uzjjZSlNhDr57DapMKdIdKD3RmPONaJaQLGjejXYAL/7Kyy1Acfh11dTEwGErxFoA/lw=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2866BB56AC03AB469EBD3160296340C1@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4a583a89-9d5d-47f5-aea9-08d7cc2e1172
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Mar 2020 17:50:52.6956 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 4CB+hSoeuojcVsRVOdTl4CgffoEoEn14fRXiP6iyViHxPBo2emtAupXif+Y4AeoCF7LWIJqXrC/ZVKetDZYFwQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB1697
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/N0OnYDzByQQRT35JLLX2G7O_INM>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs is approved.
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:50:58 -0000


> On Mar 19, 2020, at 13:43, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I wanted to let y'all know that draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs (The TACACS+
> Protocol) has just been approved - I'd like to thank the authors for
> all of the work that they put into this document[0]...
> 
> This document was adopted by OpsAWG in 2015, and has had -17
> revisions. It was IETF LCed about a year ago, and was on the
> 2019-05-16 telechat, where it garnered 5 discuss positions.
> 
> The authors have worked closely with the relevant ADs to address their
> DISCUSS positions, resulting in significant changes and improvements.
> Adam, Roman and Alexey recently cleared their DISCUSSes, and the
> document is now ready for publication.

This is excellent news.  I second the thanks for the authors, working group, and the ADs for pushing this forward.

Lest we forget, we wanted to documented the existing T+ protocol so new work could be proposed to shore up its security.  On to the new work!

Joe