Re: [OPSAWG] Minutes for 104

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 08 May 2019 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DE4120127 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 08:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id moL-z_oSmOCG for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F61B120123 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2019 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id m32so20628034qtf.0 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 May 2019 08:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kWRHvgceMdP6aHSFAyTHmA6yjsEHTL5Tpaw3CoYPJ9M=; b=YSLEGSng8u4Yc6JuXHZC/Uu4svJE68EU4eU7UOIMPshgTvkM+za440jg0NZY3oZPhO VXnGW6XK6+3DkrajGY8S0Bb0pODazQUcuiFku8Ui44xSOYpYv5wdtPb0xR8uXFVDo5NC k5mqlEZ91bR0QVAvlYO+py/kjSOrKdVR32PN14lseXOLnKYlkjQiAfWz4wUhDuMF7obF 83GcjyfyIt45IlqpfagI4hFni1XoR4Jsa9hOmHipTcWHw8VY6YHj0gRlgD2qUiatRLOo FBnW1RMeDcq5myas6c8EU3LQ5AC18gP/+Dc8yxMohcNb7+M2JPrO6DsiqtA9cdo9HXoE 4H0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kWRHvgceMdP6aHSFAyTHmA6yjsEHTL5Tpaw3CoYPJ9M=; b=nTQRGCzaNgvAFtGFNCCTBjViBAAwKdiJ8CJxCzbs6ALsFMKBbAU3IiArtScHixiDIk xHlXBMdDgTjWoJKoVIjTkdjOeNnczjl24mEq8aN8eZON1ULAjdKQH9rLCVfK1Kx2ysAB JMzjRfScjd14K3CTZY59cGEHze9xHI/aIPt3Pwa201oHmO8N0S9uv/yiVwOwn9JsxaQL ZmZsV0RshKqbcGsgYMp2UJgDaUITdH44hYviU33mmwJ9t4Em0MXbo/RGXqq84BhI9qgx LFVHB1IoT6TgMLV/9/4UbxdmvMZtyOzKBBwjZ9x0upa+D9Z1VneYg+0kToL0rK12FA0Y uyfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUuUrbKU1/ur9he0q4lO0SMUVFQWIDuzpW9KDp2cY84qFcriCAA Amb4ZpyKs/c1vA7kdVs+zwevNy6jVa9p8fs768Ax2g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy61O5M3RsiX0wx1T76fTsOGg1lP2dJB70pXEcA8EqNckwa/jMPuNxULfXY8C5uNkJGpjL5gYbdE0TPRbJhVR8=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:c16c:: with SMTP id i41mr31879627qvh.183.1557329858670; Wed, 08 May 2019 08:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BF8526FE-C5E9-4045-BFC8-20E67F189C70@cisco.com> <05bd01d50585$fda2ecc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <682E7E7C-84D8-4DAF-9F76-CE519682B8CB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <682E7E7C-84D8-4DAF-9F76-CE519682B8CB@cisco.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 11:37:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLVYOhdpxqzFuE6ms7TivJpQsPTE-wRzh+kp_jX6Uv9dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000006427f0588621d5d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/NnYge2LxuKs8hhTIdEoFMvykzUA>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Minutes for 104
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 15:37:43 -0000

This was largely a “here is a document which we want to send through the
ISE, does the WG want it instead / anyone have any objections?”

He and I had decided that it was polite to check with the WG, even though
we were fairly sure the WG would not want it...

W

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:25 AM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke@cisco.com>
wrote:

>
>
> > On May 8, 2019, at 06:12, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > I am struck by
> >
> > "CCMIB Sean Turner 5 minutes
> > Sean wants no one to comment and no one commented"
> >
> > which seems consistent; no identifier for the whatever-it-is and so
> > no-one said anything!
>
> I didn’t know how to summarize that any differently.  That’s more or less
> what he said at the mic.  But his presentation is there for the details of
> what he wants.
>
> Joe
>
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
> > To: <opsawg@ietf.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2019 10:52 PM
> > Subject: [OPSAWG] Minutes for 104
> >
> >
> >> After a long delay I have posted the draft minutes from the IETF 104
> > opsawg/Ops Area session.  I took these from notes I did in Etherpad as
> > well as the video recording on YouTube.  I missed one Huawei name at the
> > mic with the NTF draft, but I think I captured most everything else.
> >>
> >> Please review and Tianran or I know what we need to change.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/minutes-104-opsawg-00
> >>
> >> Joe
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OPSAWG mailing list
> >> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>
-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf