IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

"Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com> Mon, 22 April 2024 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF08C14F610 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 18:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZrTYd6nGGWhI for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 18:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D932BC14F5F6 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 18:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VN6vn27WMz6K90N for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:23:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100002.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.160.241]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54961140AE5 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:23:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from canpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.17) by lhrpeml100002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 02:23:37 +0100
Received: from kwepemd500012.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.25) by canpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:23:34 +0800
Received: from kwepemd500012.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.25]) by kwepemd500012.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.25]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.028; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:23:34 +0800
From: "Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
Thread-Index: AQHakmXFd8CTDe49H0GHlT5SsNGC7bFzgkMg
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 01:23:34 +0000
Message-ID: <c4e67cd374ed47708de3896b72667b0f@huawei.com>
References: <BN9PR11MB53713BCF8BB7C7AFA935127AB80D2@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB53713BCF8BB7C7AFA935127AB80D2@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.114.167]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_c4e67cd374ed47708de3896b72667b0fhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/QdDDKIBT0qbbteQ9zF_BFNYynbE>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 01:23:43 -0000

Hi Joe, all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts.

Thanks,
Bo

From: OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 10:32 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

We're up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status