IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work

Victor Lopez <vlopez.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 22 April 2024 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <vlopez.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B315BC14CE54 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w0qucYlP2ZvA for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46D7C151065 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5176f217b7bso7347869e87.0 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713794042; x=1714398842; darn=ietf.org; h=mime-version:content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to :references:message-id:date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6JxXW+t6kLqnCDSxQxMhkQoCm+etBRM2gax+6tiIJGg=; b=lKHVZNi8b8cS1z36ruHbs2T1aYS/XShiyNL+erTnGa9DPwrJrWMtQLkpVxdrJTtXnN dQVTS5BUdtDFLuPetXc5mFVq4KYKiIVy8shzvt8DLp4+qYciHGWRFgU7McVbyVAOdzut 2wFYyNGVCep2vBYxI6MyfJY22Lcq4CzZj+5QtLoMfPwinDJk0PKOV2qZhqIuoWtaR0Nj 5JCabks1Jl2Y5bwgYtkJE4Em6cb/sBPOCx7xXUBzNdhIxHoqpowLsaDlnWQTbNcri+HU ojutpk5fjreXH6kX7HtWzLuLRA+9Muw0hy6ba+y1601/z/ifrN/yzpHKTHpFDygrrRbn 1a6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713794042; x=1714398842; h=mime-version:content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to :references:message-id:date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6JxXW+t6kLqnCDSxQxMhkQoCm+etBRM2gax+6tiIJGg=; b=tRg33SlJpqXodHkiaCJMS8zrPA4r5BVWNQJ+kN03XcvyUvYl4fdKDDTgugLqwaA7P7 nmaolWKv6r2lWfkDlc/RRmVdj0467KxMk4invDtuElQ8fwbEEyndl5TcSGNyyni0qTfT SSrfg3QD7Ecc/f3pe0pmge0fyRD5c3YLDUVPr2v3btDPR9MwLV0+SrdlCp9k0DKvPFGw aYgShCYNOcdYb8s8oxPyppdAz0Dsw0n/Q7QU2nKFPvqYXUo1D4It5X1M/Mfs482+Da+P yJ2VREgUuT08/eLdRoHlXoK9GXtylMAHZk0ulmtaYQrnOGxkni0sDch+znSizoIXUHET Q6Lw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV0N4obqWESbObofdMNKzzhSRiQdU5ylAgmJ7WwFfmP+SVX2+Q6bDc0vIf43dlJ820iYEuL9QMU/pjwNn42WCQ=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwAJhzOBU+D1fQXRDMpSEtPJBvCdTnDM0n73N1vVtdChi7Qz4VK u31q6UUVF3o1F0ttfk8e7ZMLx3MktX1ZThB9zTEDV2cqtMqI4i2TMUBemHcW
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF014hIJQB2Ez09N7U0V165ydQg0UeA7xPoFn9Ca7b+R7zZiajVfCIs7A18DJ/rd1jBcksx/w==
X-Received: by 2002:a19:3855:0:b0:515:9d9e:7339 with SMTP id d21-20020a193855000000b005159d9e7339mr7243902lfj.20.1713794041406; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from AS8PR08MB8418.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1026:c03:654a::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d13-20020a170906640d00b00a5267ee40efsm5873026ejm.18.2024.04.22.06.54.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Victor Lopez <vlopez.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
Thread-Index: AQHakmXFd8CTDe49H0GHlT5SsNGC7bF0VBkC
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:54:00 +0000
Message-ID: <AS8PR08MB84181C097B011F5EE75897B1F0122@AS8PR08MB8418.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN9PR11MB53713BCF8BB7C7AFA935127AB80D2@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB53713BCF8BB7C7AFA935127AB80D2@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AS8PR08MB84181C097B011F5EE75897B1F0122AS8PR08MB8418eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/USjd-GB-Lu4NuHL0gv41i8G_uGE>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:54:06 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts

Victor

From: OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Friday, 19 April 2024 at 16:33
To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
We’re up to WG LC on these four drafts.  And while we did an IPR poll before, we want to be thorough since this work has evolved.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts”
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.

As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts.

Joe

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status