IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 16 May 2019 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F20120098; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWAmAh2oEx7Z; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F13C1200D8; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x4GEYpUv063574 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 May 2019 09:34:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1558017293; bh=Ff1xszl6IZLxmUFxvye7ZB27sIMJ7ykauBH2uzppX3g=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=e4m924/Lm7U45u1Zbo18vl8eBdCUV01QLlvIKcVRRsK1/nWAPglJf7HnHB2Nku6wT WQYsR3pH/3Znk+wX00q/wBeKHQeeQXCrwGd0t9wLnkP3vZMF6pngzKl5Vv/cPaGdVs zT9S+ouMjrzAxfMJQ72yvmVnLWI3EKadbP9FSPNQ=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: jclarke@cisco.com, opsawg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
References: <155798668553.30465.3681431548982215622.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <1967dd24-5e1f-bdce-7a8f-f2db5548c7f1@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 09:34:46 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <155798668553.30465.3681431548982215622.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/VszVZc6iaCycZVr4U4pW7N-o0SQ>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 14:35:05 -0000

On 5/16/19 1:04 AM, Adam Roach via Datatracker wrote:
> Without specification of preparation profiles for usernames and passwords,
> this is an incomplete specification of how to transmit non-ASCII
> usernames and passwords. While there are other solutions, the easy
> way to address this is to normatively reference RFC 7613, and select
> one of its username preparation profiles, and indicate its password
> preparation profile. 


And I completely missed that RFC 7613 has been obsoleted by RFC 8265. 
Please consult RFC 8265 instead.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email