IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 15 March 2017 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E541294D8; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMC2UvCe-_9s; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0665F1294D4; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1990; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1489558017; x=1490767617; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=HDSNoQ+HrWA5yM0A4kdMbUvdpRxqZBqrvwRXvmHb7yY=; b=gzrzgXAPYvYfIBk0c8vn1fxspgl+4LpKRZemOdza07HOGwfUNLCHV9eH s8riIh7hca5NBokd2s4sYYtZOsOnyUL18GLH7Eqsgxc8wK94RNMNVkSSo tlg1H+/gPpPd4c3ABYwlrWgxONwTjFF7bCDIjwPHCHXSV0YbDEGQFE8Qd E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CtAQB22MhY/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhFyEQIoNc5Bjky2CD4IOhiICgxcYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFgEFI1YQCxgqAgJXBgEMCAEBiXytcYImimABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQERD4hTgmqHWoJfBZxDg3iCCYw6gWMBiG6GU5NHHziBBCMWCBcVhxk/iWcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,167,1486425600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="653279716"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2017 06:06:54 +0000
Received: from [10.61.99.14] (dhcp-10-61-99-14.cisco.com [10.61.99.14]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2F66scn004064; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:06:54 GMT
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22E1363@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Cc: "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <34aa00dd-f811-2e42-32e1-e414a8fd37e5@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:06:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22E1363@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="brdGNxbFL6L5jDBR7M2GqtEAD9RxTCLc8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/WvivqD7lHA-DgPynYllitSAXcNI>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:06:59 -0000


On 3/15/17 2:24 AM, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Dear WG Members,
>
> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05 for working group last call. Here is an IPR poll prior to the wglc.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05.txt? 

Yes.  What I am aware of is disclosed according to IETF policies based
on the pre-adopted version of the various drafts.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email