IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] IETF 106 Discussion about draft-gray-sampled-streaming - room moved

"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com> Fri, 22 November 2019 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7D812011B for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:03:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=A3JxUlxD; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=a+uGCNJf
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id US7TjZs-Xolb for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:03:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EDD8120090 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:03:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1278; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1574388194; x=1575597794; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=UqbWoXbme5UMeIxQacHrzNdFMK4NHCRhAigNXrMIqqg=; b=A3JxUlxD5YDnHbs4A9hEqxF8GhljcDwQZUOQuzUzNxBn7HeF17TC4PXm A1g4Y/dBphuQxVlI4pzYkWUpdUL5hL6MOK0KrZ7KWO2UljtxjtUKdht8V ja5v0VnaSDm8g6jtIJa2A9hvkUtjs0rGRbN93KDP2K/Xb6z0giM7yYIMU 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:PZ/glROuoKXCviRcIhAl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEu60/l0fHCIPc7f8My/HbtaztQyQh2d6AqzhDFf4ETBoZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBj5J/rjdS83NM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BbAQDbQNdd/40NJK1kHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgW0EAQELAYFKUAWBRCAECyqEKoNGA4ptgjqYJoJSA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYRAAheCESQ3Bg4CAw0BAQQBAQECAQUEbYU3DIVSAgEDEhERDAEBNwEPAgEIGgIZDQICAjAVEAIEDieDAIJHAy4BoxUCgTiIYHWBMoJ+AQEFgkmCShiCFwmBDigBjBUagUA/gTgME4JMPoEEhlEygiyQFp4eCoIrlVAbmhioVAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaCOBWHAVZQGCQVARFIZIGCCDO4pTdIEokB0BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,228,1571702400"; d="scan'208";a="368418844"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 22 Nov 2019 02:03:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (xch-aln-010.cisco.com [173.36.7.20]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xAM23DlM020605 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:03:13 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:03:12 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:03:10 -0500
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:03:10 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Mk0L2e0FEICit5/mdNZki5N+agEpSlcK9Q+XtBao8W5HQNIc/wOw28kSi8VQ+G9K99sMTZvhaz3y0vXO/I+7dHVgBqIkKlmeWiNe3LoZTsxmt0EJkLbG0fPhbtd40QlUEUkgXCKNeYWIHCBpN9/sAix3RqIxPqSEMvCsL9MgZWJJfWSmTQ+WQOw5dZAMXHXNjZMte/KyEOpSdJUKjuHMSexqSrsvUMiwg8gieheoNqRdv/ST7FaM0LLBu+ysaL6fK21YTECpHpPa5TvUQl4UNQGogVtMNpZARysCbq+PZcETXjI8HpnekH9B6C8mmqCoU5w3NoMWGC8ZwXO+jL4CPQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UqbWoXbme5UMeIxQacHrzNdFMK4NHCRhAigNXrMIqqg=; b=i396ocfaAJ9QX0iyEUo7nmG8CZjargZ/WDl1s8EoKk3ZUY+V9evKTLWT0gtpwXgSP7i/pUqA7QtB92yqcg2Md89qQK2z/77GmJpmwV4PRdwsWDrNN55IKi3hsQ6TGw3Ta79QrkMm29mPcfDkRPSrtruUknFe3z9ePnxSXlb5M+v+Jn2BFK1gHOH8aXPMVgpI/Wop02JvvwVOfpkhaDLEJuYfFE1gSaqFWEHfPNf3wjs1QAop0jLNP42zYdKS9F05UvGECJdUwdu+EQxW4cxW2FcmnzdxGMJZ2NmRdDoQuPi7Amn5smBsE2sc2KuJXnIOxcQAVoIDEJxEGazti+ar1A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UqbWoXbme5UMeIxQacHrzNdFMK4NHCRhAigNXrMIqqg=; b=a+uGCNJf/QJ64i/UPApop/7AaNDBUOEFgNEYNvxO1scC9TlE8u9RNPzr933nzNyzRmt9gzrZ6lUfKMWZCrhDnhjnagbOMgdxFyi2o/8F3/tvvpaGdQgXetV7sJJjLZrJU1Z5Vk4wlJc/OujLbBKdZfbnhR2wwaFHgHnx63Oh/xA=
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.23.12) by BN6PR11MB1969.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.175.95.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2474.17; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:03:09 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::499:8548:e967:458e]) by BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::499:8548:e967:458e%12]) with mapi id 15.20.2474.019; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:03:09 +0000
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
To: "Gray, Andrew A" <Andrew.Gray@charter.com>
CC: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] IETF 106 Discussion about draft-gray-sampled-streaming - room moved
Thread-Index: AQHVn1iS+pL2JOzKAkehvqQJmtL70aeXWzsA//8YDAA=
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:03:09 +0000
Message-ID: <8FD4212E-DA2F-4098-BD64-692FB48A4DB1@cisco.com>
References: <5D45EBA8-4DD3-420C-A91A-AA804D6216B4@charter.com> <FF8B80EE-40CD-4D52-A83D-21484A609151@charter.com>
In-Reply-To: <FF8B80EE-40CD-4D52-A83D-21484A609151@charter.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jclarke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:67c:370:128:fd95:1167:6f3e:2ab4]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 208ca502-a771-465e-6046-08d76ef01f8b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB1969:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB1969ED5359542DAEE2971A7BB8490@BN6PR11MB1969.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 02296943FF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(76116006)(46003)(66476007)(8676002)(6246003)(7736002)(4744005)(86362001)(305945005)(2906002)(4326008)(6916009)(102836004)(478600001)(76176011)(81156014)(81166006)(14454004)(33656002)(8936002)(6506007)(256004)(6512007)(64756008)(6486002)(66946007)(66556008)(25786009)(91956017)(11346002)(316002)(6436002)(36756003)(2616005)(71190400001)(99286004)(446003)(71200400001)(6116002)(186003)(5660300002)(66446008)(229853002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR11MB1969; H:BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ptPr8WlnCFwq7B94Nb4ll84MMllhrmWZNcOWAxAKbZGnB47Mvz+ExsB7fRWTx8EBjx7ZxaZSAKEqaufd+5tvnJ+Z4UQRYrnBbj7j5cfeDGtBlyL9Agl9+tC2FmeKnp1I5HeGp1XrDUJtUva/dbGMbD8RoirrJkz2amt60Y99ZTvWT+Ql5L02wWxNMcuaMsyWt+iAk9LW8YZWOI4JnfJ+7v2B5x9+wwMpjhHOKSYrhh0gt+UAsLKakeVEKAGU3GQtiMQXQMLYEBcXMt+cSxCAn0Bg6kVvbBSMwBjdt6OxRliKQE8+SDwKbXGlepZ7CTlqWJglVpfXVkqHqyhJXDe18/uM4KmPjZtzChvtp6MLqwNtEyElK9M70WxqJVIyLaQBRM1AnzsZJ9Jf7XvaOU0Rdd0NBfzD7aOR7LVaVMaPIYBDevT02q5viT+4N4GHmCcL
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7AFB4EA8E406E6449AF92117ED94E97B@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 208ca502-a771-465e-6046-08d76ef01f8b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Nov 2019 02:03:09.4329 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: C5e6/TonEvkaLQGFRDaErzk/wXDedlEnjtJhm1+xU7Q4pFbPUomaauJzInd4D3WsQFVO333Pgxr9WXsPvyywaQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB1969
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.20, xch-aln-010.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/YC5EOF_0bC1gtc-_mHJXcLmZsfA>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IETF 106 Discussion about draft-gray-sampled-streaming - room moved
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:03:16 -0000

> - Freeform performance penalty (points?) - finger in the wind numbers (make sure to emphasize that it is an estimate) - include things like other resources used (CAM entries, memory, etc?).  Number would only be relative to the device itself.

I had to leave around this discussion, but I really wasn’t following why this would be better than straight forwarding capacity.  That is, an overall “points” value doesn’t necessarily help much since some may care about CAM space and some may care about forwarding capacity, but they don’t know how the points break down.  Like Frank, I’d like to stick to something simple and more well-defined like forwarding capacity.

> - Informational or Standards track?

It’s informational now, and I have no problem with that given the looseness in the draft.  As it evolves, it may be better to move it to Standards.  I think it should stay where it is for now.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email