Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 02 February 2021 09:51 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEE93A18EB; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:51:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y5tHPcS4rpG7; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:51:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1C853A18E9; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:51:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 1129plhR012105; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:51:47 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C5E2203A; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:51:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C4BF2203D; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:51:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.201.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 1129pif6017340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:51:45 GMT
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>, "'Erik Kline'" <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Ops Area WG'" <opsawg@ietf.org>, <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds@ietf.org>
References: <06bf01d6f884$18acfd10$4a06f730$@olddog.co.uk> <m2h7mvfv0p.wl-randy@psg.com> <075b01d6f8d8$c189db70$449d9250$@olddog.co.uk> <CAMGpriVLv2g1TFV_Wr8KvTKbqS03am3xf2PvhvAaqF=HVn8HeQ@mail.gmail.com> <m24kivfgq7.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m24kivfgq7.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:51:44 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <07f801d6f949$048f7e50$0dae7af0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFV2pWrMD8L80NxalLEZfAag+BYoADWfMLtAlURzbABJVT7ewJRCh6zqxHNT3A=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.201.183
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25942.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.700-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.700-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25942.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--3.700000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: hls5oAVArl/xIbpQ8BhdbCQWufwDJ4K93JwFMzrIETkfWPlLPu2WESzr MMF3CEtHyb/dWeBuSo6H7/YaXrc5rOawEZB3W1iFlVHM/F6YkvQL8TGleseLPAp+tuYb4NtQ6Fc vdo8QcCje6ceYY2gIZKEjr8YDiP+YwcuUB8N/YGaY4WcYQvQk4/i4nVERfgwdmomWFGokSaRWFh mPLWym/t1dwzZ2yBXWKCiVge3CfsAv9901qElB+isIuzCLc2mNIVpGz/U+S0ggK4p1fKVZt3Q7c /s1EnkfiJnhAsEtDU6Rk6XtYogiarQ/aqQZTRfKU6baA36eiazEQdG7H66TyKsQd9qPXhnJgkIS +LXhXXBo8aUCRy3xH9v3UvSYhJqtfXR224EZEnSXLmUVITErf4VVQNakxuYvLChzPWCazAG8tjG xQSo5FR8pm+0EPqklPURdTVywU2SHx/3593XRE+S+ZTuCPZ+tPifujgI13do9uJNyHSmbfg==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/YK5WpSjLtl0QlWFPvOZybka-KNM>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 09:51:53 -0000

Well, "whatever", but I liked the paragraph we had arrived at.

A

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> 
Sent: 02 February 2021 00:37
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk; Ops Area WG <opsawg@ietf.org>rg>;
opsawg-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

>> 8805 was, of course, an Independent Stream production. So I carry as much
>> responsibility as anyone else for the lack of privacy discussion. But,
more
>> significantly, I am entirely responsible for not having noted section 4
of
>> RFC 8805 when I wrote my email - oops.
> 
> Yeah, I was pretty sure we had written something.  =)
> 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8805.html#name-privacy-considerations

and i am guilty of not rereading 8805

may i suggest that finding-geofeeds merely say

   All the privacy considerations of RFC8804 Section 4 apply to this
   document.

saves a lot of words thereby reducing the rfc editor fee.

randy