[OPSAWG] Now what? (was: draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-01 posted)

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Mon, 02 May 2011 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC53E0741 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.37
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.37 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.370, BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SNNBTG7l87hg for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DE7E072E for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=Tbe1JRwfUfx3Bk1WbylIrxoBJOApbmx82j8gQAudjO5U5mBGrJiO9V2G0nKmjeIF; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [99.41.49.173] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1QGxuR-0000O4-Hv for opsawg@ietf.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 14:31:51 -0400
Message-ID: <000801cc08f7$8a431c20$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: opsawg@ietf.org
References: <006f01cc03be$2e846580$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:34:14 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888cc964a8bf633b38269d34070245fb13f0e52e1d2dbb801c4350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 99.41.49.173
Subject: [OPSAWG] Now what? (was: draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-01 posted)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 18:31:52 -0000

Hi -

In a few hours it will have been a full week since the updated
draft reflecting the WG last call comments was posted.  I'd like
to hear from the chairs regarding their intentions for when this
might be handed to the IESG.

I don't think the document's length or complexity should be an
issue.  :-)

Randy

> From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> To: <opsawg@ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 8:01 PM
> Subject: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-01 posted
...
> I've posted an updated draft.  The announcement should
> soon appear.  I believe this is ready to be taken to the
> IESG, since all WG last call comments have been resolved.
....