Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-01.txt

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Wed, 01 June 2011 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21592E06BC for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRTmTH5WxcvV for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE173E07B3 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=TttAGyYWGF0wih2o2msMmoWE4zP/Wbz4yode6JgRGf6pq2C2No223FdbJlzrAj9A; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [99.187.238.178] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1QRqSW-0003C2-2y; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:48:00 -0400
Message-ID: <001301cc208c$eea67b60$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, opsawg@ietf.org
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0403328E7C@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:51:34 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888cc964a8bf633b382a5f529d21720b8a02bf38644f2c852ad350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 99.187.238.178
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-01.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:49:20 -0000

Hi -

> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
> To: <opsawg@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 4:51 AM
> Subject: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-01.txt
>
> 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> Please find below the AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-01.txt.
> The document is in good shape and I am sending it to IETF Last Call.
> Please consider the comments below together with the other IETF LC
> comments. 

Both as editor and as a technical contributor,
I think all of these items are non-contentious.

> Technical comments are marked T and Editorial comments are marked E. 
> 
> E1. 
> 
>       mib-2                                 FROM SNMPv2-SMI
>       TEXTUAL-CONVENTION                    FROM SNMPv2-TC;
> 
> Add -- RFC 2758 and -- RFC 2759 for each of the imports, so that the
> source RFC number can be available if the MIB module us used extracted
> from the RFC. 

Fixed in the editor's copy.

> E2. The name of the IEEE standard referenced in the document is 'IEEE
> Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic' and not 'IEEE Standard for
> Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic' as written in the REFERENCE clauses
> and in the Normative References section - see
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4610935&tag=1

Also fixed in the editor's copy.

These changes will show up with the next I-D, which will probably be at the
close of the last call.

Randy