IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-01.txt

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Thu, 01 December 2022 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E58C14CE4F for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:02:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITBk8C0ffSTw for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:02:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sea.shrubbery.net (sea.shrubbery.net [129.250.47.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48045C14F725 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by sea.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id C2DE93AB773; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:02:33 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 20:02:33 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
Cc: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "andrej@ota.si" <andrej@ota.si>, "Douglas Gash (dcmgash)" <dcmgash@cisco.com>, "thorsten.dahm@gmail.com" <thorsten.dahm@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Y4kIWe/7GBHrlXf0@shrubbery.net>
References: <166987104468.50685.985158519755735069@ietfa.amsl.com> <Y4g8SzupPkBSLotd@shrubbery.net> <BN9PR11MB537172F6CBAFD044B490CF09B8149@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB537172F6CBAFD044B490CF09B8149@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/a0W4hp9Tt2NFcdBG4kno88zKBAo>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-01.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 20:02:47 -0000

Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:00:53PM +0000, Joe Clarke (jclarke):
> I’ve read the -01 revision, and the new text in Section 4 seems logical to me.  Being a bit pedantic, it might be good to reference that section when deciding on the correct ERROR to send.

No problem; that will be in the next version.  Thanks

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email