Re: [OPSAWG] Progressing draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs

"Douglas Gash (dcmgash)" <dcmgash@cisco.com> Mon, 27 January 2020 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <dcmgash@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A4412080C; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:51:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=N40cWzu2; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=LtcJbqED
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id swd-05Pn2Tb3; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:51:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB56912080A; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:51:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1726; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1580140310; x=1581349910; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=scmRrCEFLXpy7qUQl948cW5EjOtBO/qvjFaIlZinvpw=; b=N40cWzu2vMT8+oXp9gUfX6jQBV0hRM1lirP2RL1AKeU8DQBz80OaTubQ q3RwHDaiEjvJAJ54AYcfJGW+VzmruHMHfgKSToKwwdsEfVCDcRh94B21g 17kQDtrf4ZcETdmbaGZ1kL7zrxo/4DbgQQfpieo6qRWt318Lly1boZTkj Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:wp8TQh+Gz/CJ7P9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+8ZB7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVcKODELyN/7CZC0hF8MEX1hgrDm2
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CuAACBBi9e/5tdJa1mGgEBAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYF7gVRQBYFEIAQLKoQUg0YDixSCX5gPglIDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgEBhEACF4INJDgTAgMNAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFXgEBAQECARIREQwBATcBDwIBCBgCAiYCAgIwFRACBAENBSKDBIJLAw4gAQKgfwKBOYhhdYEygn8BAQWFExiCDAmBDiqMHhqCAIE4IIJMPoRggnkygiyNOYMcnwcKgjmWNxuCSIgKkCqOYIFKmUMCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkigVhwFWUBgkFQGA2TbINzilN0gSmMYwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,370,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="422569127"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 Jan 2020 15:51:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (xch-aln-010.cisco.com [173.36.7.20]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00RFpn9g016663 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:51:49 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:51:48 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:51:48 -0500
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:51:47 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MnWenpUZTpLmkzZD1oZ/dxw2s7qCumREx8ytHWUMZPyh4ODydX7D4cNgky1PgO5qGNhIJ5sC/+3wUC9YUX864CXv5DzTQHpFhdGsLVg6rFLKq6uSXQ6qpuEYXI5CCbMdx924trRHITdPs67A30ieAz6NThskEu5jHKmd6Sj4N3mglqriZ2Q3TffmrD7DFqZFHx+gbEnZM7XJD6sfIz0f/gMxggRkdHadldogEZ7rpyJyyYwQRKyzxSfLhJe/du0DamnHB0YXrbKJuyJJl65uKxl5qLZGfby3MoHnMl4smsUh3pXz09ZdZlaNc5k5OwWNhDWkL4nVRKvm14tO8mSuKQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=scmRrCEFLXpy7qUQl948cW5EjOtBO/qvjFaIlZinvpw=; b=mnFRdjJW8P23KCvn1pnxbemiDk6LTHO7iNwhrdHzIjB4vL2r9RYR/DlbWi/FXt6zgj6uKMxGYBXHSQOQisCt9iIGZTfgdhWXlhWm+xXC7QifVxbOi2a5Ya6U1W/JmWaBilcA2ZkyqE0GL3Io6K+dznS1gO90CuFfYRydPRNP9KCQA+nAem8+xGBQAODqyEG+ywVU/C3jY4EpfbPqszOLw4twjCTvfxxvtSTyQvTDWmDxwLWi6hP65XAC8jveiA81pEwvXlscoRbMBHlDI+al5SKvuISUo3rvMj9lJ0taE8ncO5UPJeIjDwfd4E2Ly2bsQKwgRXK+OcOwGaiYoCBReQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=scmRrCEFLXpy7qUQl948cW5EjOtBO/qvjFaIlZinvpw=; b=LtcJbqEDG2RVSDxxoLvXhmX7GGDujYfwj8VWU5l5x12v47fNg9aqsYUN13kii4094+WcWnlttjMRR3v5cfBlSrkgjuZxJWpx7Q6Uo9Ke6Lyn1+lD56dYMNQJFkEojoHd7w8FhvKnsbI4LmfKGCpU77bWW9kUx5peXUvEmZS7iWU=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4190.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.151.223) by MN2PR11MB4399.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.36.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.20; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:51:46 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4190.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d03a:678e:544a:d253]) by MN2PR11MB4190.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d03a:678e:544a:d253%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2665.017; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:51:46 +0000
From: "Douglas Gash (dcmgash)" <dcmgash@cisco.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Progressing draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs
Thread-Index: AQHV1ScQtG3Iqj1E8k2ffNDwko25Wqf+pmuAgAACoIA=
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:51:46 +0000
Message-ID: <0C92A964-903D-47FE-B8AB-006B88C7F314@cisco.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJUkwpdEnun9mjvd6UH0cVaGeh4LEsm20aq_OHUBB9JrA@mail.gmail.com> <E2DF640A-9FEA-47CD-A25B-42622AFE0FEA@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E2DF640A-9FEA-47CD-A25B-42622AFE0FEA@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.26.0.170902
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=dcmgash@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1008::27a]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: de6f4c29-6854-4729-9f14-08d7a340d081
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4399:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB439968E9C374223169EE1ECBB70B0@MN2PR11MB4399.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 02951C14DC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(376002)(396003)(346002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(186003)(8676002)(2906002)(36756003)(53546011)(6486002)(6512007)(86362001)(2616005)(6506007)(81166006)(81156014)(110136005)(4326008)(316002)(54906003)(71200400001)(5660300002)(33656002)(478600001)(64756008)(66476007)(66446008)(66556008)(91956017)(66946007)(76116006)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4399; H:MN2PR11MB4190.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: y4wvTcG8RZKL9c5bth7EWXiMkjdyR5L5kpegkPKJ1pp4J0etXLeWNs7Ov2Km78oxdMa3JkOS63X8DMLnjc67h9xeE8cRRWywY3VVxGyK1vF5ZN5C5N0EMmgHXhKqHvcJlSEIN69cJvkt6s7TNG7bwuRrSl8lnURuVQAt/dQN0kUaHME4Cqj1ipvNlZ944ZUUzvoeIw9DvHnUt+0o8Is/QE94vD41kZqap/GOD9UeIvvtOkHL5ytNXkTa0xZCdxpA1AWQk/wLFLo5XqFcWSCs9k+gpdhGikLNz8MZlAvIUA02yD1vLCVDfgEA8/3bAFTlj4AWdTTIHUX4xlOwKnMGiJnHQ6BkzcsixWB92M/Vscq6KVwPwYpKWIDDksAF9nqUtqCH7v6fJqQNXO37KgDlYSGBsYKH7s4f0bBK/+7Ff74bUv3DQM3Eiy1v/1U6eOKo
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: dBxXyos1yc783x3jF01R1XaBL4lbEKJI9x0LQ6fLVeQM3oAEX6DzDROE4WTYbr3pgpWZfrXg/pcWpGaBhom/CLyM9lGwaHG1tit+Cx/Ck9CwpFEJ9DsqJ1ZHNpdjX/g05KWWbM8P2iNVKdsnbQmxgVq4sQV18pz+EVD+OfdKpdM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <DD690C013A62A14F8DFABE8BFB192096@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: de6f4c29-6854-4729-9f14-08d7a340d081
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Jan 2020 15:51:46.6335 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: bpA99yGVz+pKUe8aO0zUAlhn1JOHWWQwYxmjUhwFs/dqKVYi/vavwPJSQKujMjLg2IMapOjcPK73NYb0Z5+DLQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4399
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.20, xch-aln-010.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/a7tdoV0eegBAnG240kfzAkmC0n8>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Progressing draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:51:53 -0000

Will do. 

On 27/01/2020, 15:42, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote:

    
    
    > On Jan 27, 2020, at 10:31, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
    > 
    > Hi there authors and WG,
    > 
    > I'm now the responsible AD for this document.
    > 
    > There is *significant* history here, and it is going to take
    > substantial archeology to rebuild the state, etc.
    > 
    > Authors, there are currently 2 open DISUCSS positions - these
    > DISCUSSES were opened against version -13 of the document, and it is
    > now at version -16; it is your belief that this version addresses the
    > DISCUSSes? Have you had substantive discussions with the DISCUSS
    > holders (Roman and Alexey)?
    > 
    > I'd like to get this document moved along, and / or figure out what we
    > are doing with it.
    
    I’ve been communicating with the authors.  They are working on a concerted message to address the open DISCUSSes.  I feel they have resolved them mostly in content, but some additional conversation will need to be had to make sure all points are addressed and understood.
    
    Authors, please update us ASAP.  It would be great to progress this for 107.
    
    Joe