[OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 01 December 2022 02:26 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4940AC13A8C3 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bzROWPNr7hfb for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C201C13A044 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 3DF431C75937; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:13 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: unpproductions@gmail.com, panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp, mrm@vmware.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, keiichi@iijlab.net, tina.tsou.zouting@huawei.com, opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221201022613.3DF431C75937@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:13 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/a_6H_JMlbFrAHaNyRd1Fn6-9UqY>
Subject: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 02:26:17 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7666,
"Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7258

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Dana Renee Hopkins <unpproductions@gmail.com>

Section: 3233702267

Original Text
-------------
Search RFCs
number, title, keyword, or author surname
Advanced Search
RFC Editor
RFC Errata
RFC 7666, "Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor", October 2015
Source of RFC: opsawg (ops)
Found 1 record.

Errata ID: 4710
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: jean-marie Kubek
Date Reported: 2016-06-15
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2016-06-17
Section 6.2 IANA MIB says:

IANAStorageMediaType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
       STATUS       current
       DESCRIPTION
               "The media type of a storage device:

               unknown(1)     The media type is unknown, e.g., because
                              the implementation failed to obtain the
                              media type from the hypervisor.

               other(2)       The media type is other than those
                              defined in this conversion.
It should say:

IANAStorageMediaType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
       STATUS       current
       DESCRIPTION
               "The media type of a storage device:

                 other(1)       The media type is other than those
                                defined in this conversion.

                 unknown(2)     The media type is unknown, e.g., because
                                the implementation failed to obtain the
                                media type from the hypervisor.

Notes:

Inversion of other and unknown integer values in the description of the IANAStorageMediaType TEXTUAL-CONVENTION.

FIrst referenced at IANA RT as [IANA #913286] Incoherency in IANA-STORAGE-MEDIA-TYPE-MIB

Search for errata for other RFCs.

Report New Errata



IAB • IANA • IETF • IRTF • ISE • ISOC • IETF Trust
Reports • Privacy Statement • Site Map • Contact Us


Document Retrieval
Errata
Frequently Asked Questions
Future Format FAQ
History
About Us
Other Information
Publication Process
Publication Queue
Style Guide
Advanced Search
number, title, keyword, or author surname


Corrected Text
--------------
Enclosure

Notes
-----
It's not the right document

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7666 (draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor
Publication Date    : October 2015
Author(s)           : H. Asai, M. MacFaden, J. Schoenwaelder, K. Shima, T. Tsou
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Operations and Management Area Working Group
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG