[OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 01 December 2022 02:26 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4940AC13A8C3 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bzROWPNr7hfb for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C201C13A044 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 3DF431C75937; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:13 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: unpproductions@gmail.com, panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp, mrm@vmware.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, keiichi@iijlab.net, tina.tsou.zouting@huawei.com, opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221201022613.3DF431C75937@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:26:13 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/a_6H_JMlbFrAHaNyRd1Fn6-9UqY>
Subject: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 02:26:17 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7666, "Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7258 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dana Renee Hopkins <unpproductions@gmail.com> Section: 3233702267 Original Text ------------- Search RFCs number, title, keyword, or author surname Advanced Search RFC Editor RFC Errata RFC 7666, "Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor", October 2015 Source of RFC: opsawg (ops) Found 1 record. Errata ID: 4710 Status: Verified Type: Editorial Publication Format(s) : TEXT Reported By: jean-marie Kubek Date Reported: 2016-06-15 Verifier Name: Benoit Claise Date Verified: 2016-06-17 Section 6.2 IANA MIB says: IANAStorageMediaType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The media type of a storage device: unknown(1) The media type is unknown, e.g., because the implementation failed to obtain the media type from the hypervisor. other(2) The media type is other than those defined in this conversion. It should say: IANAStorageMediaType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The media type of a storage device: other(1) The media type is other than those defined in this conversion. unknown(2) The media type is unknown, e.g., because the implementation failed to obtain the media type from the hypervisor. Notes: Inversion of other and unknown integer values in the description of the IANAStorageMediaType TEXTUAL-CONVENTION. FIrst referenced at IANA RT as [IANA #913286] Incoherency in IANA-STORAGE-MEDIA-TYPE-MIB Search for errata for other RFCs. Report New Errata IAB • IANA • IETF • IRTF • ISE • ISOC • IETF Trust Reports • Privacy Statement • Site Map • Contact Us Document Retrieval Errata Frequently Asked Questions Future Format FAQ History About Us Other Information Publication Process Publication Queue Style Guide Advanced Search number, title, keyword, or author surname Corrected Text -------------- Enclosure Notes ----- It's not the right document Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7666 (draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor Publication Date : October 2015 Author(s) : H. Asai, M. MacFaden, J. Schoenwaelder, K. Shima, T. Tsou Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Operations and Management Area Working Group Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (725… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 … Chris Smiley
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 … Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 … Jürgen Schönwälder