[OPSAWG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

Erez Segev <Erez.Segev@ecitele.com> Sun, 05 January 2020 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Erez.Segev@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1589F1200C3 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 07:58:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ecitele.com header.b=Za/lXqAM; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=eci365.onmicrosoft.com header.b=uTp7i6vQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qpcRj0QaBzCe for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 07:58:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com [85.158.142.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E547112001E for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 07:58:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ecitele.com; s=eciselector10072019; t=1578239890; i=@ecitele.com; bh=nrd6dRCWsWnhEHZXqbCW2XCoJa3Jgt0AHMz6abyPJhI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Za/lXqAMFmaSQM8hVf4IrRv1YXLYo2kkzYpGW9IPlBnLXHNGMEsUfgeoW2oDyNyju zVMcrMefrTuaya42rHU9is6ZX7MimvwisggbHnVHhvvhTOv45rGhvX/mX0B3XAXPoh 8nuq+nG4HyWVqvqdG49WLrc1FFmp0gVt1tBdzDOw=
Received: from [85.158.142.101] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) by server-6.bemta.az-a.eu-central-1.aws.symcld.net id 67/22-22203-197021E5; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 15:58:09 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA2VTf0wTdxTne3dtb4RuRwF5NjpHxwY62rS6GYy b4w+Jmv1w2UIibDCvtKNN2qO0ZQNnBnEb0Qpbxy+lOkFKYTR0kYorCy4wlk1KnQgBZ1A3OyoD ByxOp4gGd9dr3Zb98/J57/P5vPe+l3ckLukQSUltmVVrZmiDTBhLSOarvfLPRJIC5cBNPPML/ 0ksC21va7uLvYbyBHpGXVy2W6DrONyLTP6KsnsdM4JK1FZuQ7Ekolw4nLv9q8CGHmGTHwjYV2 3hiZMIhs7UiriEoDw4fDx9RMglEqoGgx5nAOeTnxEELlwO+4XUWlhwNAs5nEilwfHvr2A2RJI J1AYYGN7NlzNhceoPAVdOpBQwNafkygSVChenG8NOMZUPLlcwstEKuDPchXEYp5JhMtQcxkAl QnA0IORxEsxOLUf0u8DV7yD4egqMTnyKeLwaxpoPIm4sUE9Cz0w+X34FvN2nIvJ1UH/Fg/PYA G3upoj1afBdGImMXQUBz3z45UA1ElD79dGwSEIVwtDRm5FGj4O7JkhEDVcv+oS8wU6Af9SF8U ukwvJguR1lOP71NAcrw6kDCMZbrooc4W8RD/6mEOFgLTjFwHTwDV6fAS19fwp5/Ay0H/8dj+K zA1PY/+sZcO+2LaJPgUsTDQJ+lhPBXHcDERWdW7xFREX1B4OiFiR2o01qs75IZzXSeoNcpVTK VaoNcpV8vSpTQe+R0wptqbxQy1jNNMsq6PcsCku5sdCgUTBaqxext6kpQZO96MBf84pBtJLEZ EliUdVjBZJH1cWach1t0b1tLjVoLYNoFUnKQJzAHrEk3qwt0pa9ozewFx6lgYyTJYpf5GixxU QbLfoinhpG2aR99vNWnFy462Sj393GxhvheIeLEoIpZrTSZHGFkDVTnFlXyjxsHf1/xtBqaYI YxcTESOJMWrNRb/0vfx0lk0iWIM7gusTpGevDDa6zy2HscrEz8dxyVvofSlqJpU7O9SkOpXzT o7m2tWbjCXS6UfFlQJke+u1Ulsr34foHtoJS7L5xqd/V9ZGvYLqvxKZMKm7pdGd2btJso9X9L 5veHPAOhHIPOd//Ljs3M93sVLvbsUXX3sn92/NOHJtO3Xzp1ZzF5/B9PRM7n+hdfqHLJJ2tXN PexTS9ld5kUnqX6n8JVDl/tOk947k5+1WazWvtFdvG0g53LpU7njckd36ryMmq+Cnw+vnmNXW mRs8H3XkLp8+fSdsCvba9/e/6QiPj9/OPtNatGPfUVO0cKrHXdjRs/OrYS3WM+vK1kdY92a6z OyQrrYNGb9JIvOmTplvVD5RbyamnttRkS29UPmvP2CUjLDpatQ43W+i/ATE/QYS6BAAA
X-Env-Sender: Erez.Segev@ecitele.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-226.messagelabs.com!1578239886!742368!1
X-Originating-IP: [18.237.140.178]
X-SYMC-ESS-Client-Auth: mailfrom-relay-check=pass
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.44.22; banners=ecitele.com,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 17137 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2020 15:58:08 -0000
Received: from p01c.mail.dlp.protect.symantec.com (HELO mail.ds.dlp.protect.symantec.com) (18.237.140.178) by server-2.tower-226.messagelabs.com with ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP; 5 Jan 2020 15:58:08 -0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GAe7AG3xm3Y1WBadz6MYVLZcBSEK7JvjYZU+fVW1g+8i3/eNQ2kKNkqM8udY00GvZNHC+SRIBldjJP0Z6HORvQ1hcu0ubpGHZXDBK5LbR93ChSBKqh/Z5sc12oc+Xad6VqlhpN7pjn8WSxs6zqq96TaLyBGg3IrWA0oyADaTpYpztm4gLzljlQLGD1ESEHsdBNtUPaN3H6rBfkkGz3kKbEeamTc4n0c5wUO9F+0WyhCFnIqI7Kmxl3aZ6G0WqZpWsDZAZCI1rjNBZAYuBkgYUUI1kD+JNcPQecbZvhQBe25kRD14OZFp7I7bih1+DHvskAVBaJyjMTSYzdww1fVXXw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BK1RhGk2kyBV6hP7kATESIkMrl/A+QJ98zoNBLc3aPA=; b=DiGvPvofI5UB7P3QKXbYZJ4TdX7V/jjc43Z8rjmIERZtOAXhftSENTnj+uqOypY7QS2D+fG9hD5kRMoye09e/koVJFv/6T8rFtIzK866so1r1hwQj2XFvZ+sA/plqP/59qEPHWhTu7aIfO1ds3D4BTvjoX5EZxcuTP47WgHloV8MCzIN2lc1jDFsm6iCFGU4/mwwdebPuKapBbLDJhtqvZOBo3jcYzhsiUmpoeTcDk3LiX9zhDeoagF9k0vdrdPW0Nb+LqFMlZu0Omd06+E/EFveUPszjQD1hHJFYeqt3YZbKtA6oqKqtPGxe18kpiaP/3P+dZ4/VAeqhvVncQjrOQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ecitele.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ecitele.com; dkim=pass header.d=ecitele.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ECI365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-ECI365-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BK1RhGk2kyBV6hP7kATESIkMrl/A+QJ98zoNBLc3aPA=; b=uTp7i6vQCBbvV/l9bZpl7AR9ujUHCDRzrkuqV5a60kQ1L1AY4r1XXbfMTYmMK2n5NgNxzcQp2R5X2zXQXroJawCboJCBmg3Gbo7J1ZLVAWWVmfe50jWNgQaX1OTtOBakgzV/spVSpO2TycET5lqX91kFThRYo0XCqgBAoOrbZek=
Received: from AM0PR03MB5124.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (20.178.82.81) by AM0PR03MB5121.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (20.178.22.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2602.12; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 15:58:04 +0000
Received: from AM0PR03MB5124.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::dc21:c749:5757:3eab]) by AM0PR03MB5124.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::dc21:c749:5757:3eab%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2602.015; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 15:58:04 +0000
From: Erez Segev <Erez.Segev@ecitele.com>
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm
Thread-Index: AdXD3QMW807SbHfQT+q5p/S+ia37Bw==
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 15:58:04 +0000
Message-ID: <AM0PR03MB5124647454490E982B2F919F863D0@AM0PR03MB5124.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.234.241.2]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9b74eddc-a83e-464c-aa72-08d791f80c6a
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR03MB5121:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR03MB5121FA4D9761CCA1CE3AAC77863D0@AM0PR03MB5121.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 027367F73D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(376002)(39850400004)(189003)(199004)(2906002)(5660300002)(86362001)(316002)(478600001)(6916009)(76116006)(81166006)(6506007)(861006)(8676002)(55016002)(9686003)(26005)(186003)(66616009)(52536014)(8936002)(9326002)(66476007)(81156014)(33656002)(71200400001)(7696005)(66446008)(66556008)(64756008)(4744005)(66946007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR03MB5121; H:AM0PR03MB5124.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ecitele.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: tDz4LTlY7yk4/JtaBf/pTlAtF1jVmx2O0xshZiqQxWLU72IGRRoAdPTiFD+Ym+okkK5fYjg9fRR+D9aB/MZ+E5GbufrB22m1GgYk2k3ToQnbHlU4XH8d2ZppQm8TCan8lvc9NpbWYlg9d1XrTTaEK81w82Nyf4Qgsu+pjez44Gq4Kl9777usfZ6bWkVNqE2VzkLMtNd299wIA9j46zlwGc0F2iVNeFVQIoIyrLbM7OQY4fWxPe9H9iMc+oObEJwQP9RnLSPhroJo/nCl+Nstwa6Suca8qRq3LEHTz3tdWGISVwvXPnSOUCH/33KCqgICsc0brdnglKHQ8kdkUXRMoD2hsp+7ENHey5IEinQBDYFgtcx/U7N7tQawoYcj+V0uBXrI1Qj1j7JFn9vhKZZR8JrLy43NSmfsOOW/u7jHAjy64dWY0UpH23jA9EJzFqSetBhWTZz28sHb46oYXgOcNBTge0m49nXZME0qW9x2y5I=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_AM0PR03MB5124647454490E982B2F919F863D0AM0PR03MB5124eurp_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9b74eddc-a83e-464c-aa72-08d791f80c6a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Jan 2020 15:58:04.0869 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: VvvE4adKzqZ4e5bYzxPfl9fRXugHyHaKcgGfk6xEd+bGvczcVcqs8a3YTLSXzJocM7JecuZEhAi3edMVBFTvrA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR03MB5121
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-DetectorID-Processed: d8d3a2b3-1594-4c39-92fb-b8312fe65a8a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/cR3zGNQu0UbjwBYWpUZ8_mp8IbU>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 15:58:15 -0000

Hi,

According to the YANG tree presented in the draft, the routing protocols are associated to vpn-network-access.
However PE-CE protocols configuration (BGP, static routes, OSPF) are set over the network-instance (VRF) an not in the context of interface (as soon as the interface created the protocol can start).
In some case the interface is important (IPv6 link-local address) , but in this case a reference to the right interface leaf can work.

As such I believe attaching the routing-protocols to vpn-node is more accurate.

BTW, In L3SM (RFC8299) the routing-protocol is a site entity and not site-network-access entity we works under the same logic.

Regards,
Erez





Erez Segev
NFV&SDN System Engineer

T:
+972.3.9287393
M:
+972.50.7057393
E:
erez.segev@ecitele.com<mailto:erez.segev@ecitele.com>

www.ecitele.com<http://www.ecitele.com/>
[cid:image001.png@01D0A206.A2B15AE0]



___________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___________________________________________________________________________