Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats
Juergen Quittek <ietf@quittek.at> Thu, 31 March 2011 15:14 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@quittek.at>
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B371428C12B for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q0peNk8WS5mb for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F68F28C124 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.47] ([88.208.109.142]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M9AKX-1QFWKZ10DF-00CVAz; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:15:59 +0200
References: <3D50A761-7279-4564-A8EA-6CBAAD62CC84@cdl.asgaard.org>
In-Reply-To: <3D50A761-7279-4564-A8EA-6CBAAD62CC84@cdl.asgaard.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-9--992672322"
Message-Id: <4CD5A6BA-7C3C-42ED-9CBB-9ACDB3F7F77B@quittek.at>
From: Juergen Quittek <ietf@quittek.at>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:15:58 +0200
To: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Qw+C1B6+0LAvinjOZCy/X/DjPDpE9rQPDIzky1lSlTU qjMovOfO0vqZYs9TXagJDyom51tKe1WOh7tTWMW+DddH8jacMk DDid/s6Ojr8KwWDvOo3iYUS/iJsM3IpvR9vdFN0guPRDfkA2I7 yW1LaP0lFdLG6xsg2LoqclB0McwrhRafxdCyDgwU4W45E4Avme C8LAjpItYkkrQC8XPEoxg==
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:14:22 -0000
I have read the draft and have only one question:
Would the byte order (endianness) in the octet arrays be obvious to an implementor?
Or could there be incompatibilities between big-endian and little-endian implementations?
Juergen
Am 29.03.2011 um 13:17 schrieb Christopher LILJENSTOLPE:
> Greetings,
>
> We are also advancing draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats to working group last call. Please make your comments before 0000UTC on 5 April 2011.
>
> Thank you,
> Chris
>
> ---
> 李柯睿
> Check my PGP key here:
> https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Bert (IETF) Wijnen
- [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Juergen Quittek
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Robert Story
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Juergen Quittek
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Dave Shield
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats Robert Story