[OPSAWG] Progressing draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 27 January 2020 15:32 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA24120847 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:32:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id okJlEPhH3YDk for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:32:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C18EB12083D for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:32:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id d5so7681511qto.0 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:32:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=O0Hsw1OBcqrEh5oj4mJXaXhvfbMkbjEqkX3dR9XWTwM=; b=WHpFfURnWlvqRP4z8qBoBCuRCWMfEMa3ZpwlVMmXIj3YP52H7D9fOQj9o7Mu4AEUWL hxJe1fKXOyPZ9vCqVRn44AzXrWws+1ke7HhFISWfDL5/5cqFvskYS2KfWnxMKhAVVfg6 UxJJPMCHczyO1I0j4VbLicLOs7PwbdNvL5cBvViWisEHfq737n2x517YLlKcm2cfoi59 sQLh+HJzvZZ2BnRqD9eH8D+G+rHxkZSoJmfhqJZzg84T3m1w8aF7/dFQiIASdnJxWc42 /ZObk+wkWrIyYsrvYyBL1uhyg60eYwrvVfVzTF51qknhgj6AsdRnSYyH26F4BqIdj+3Q ZqjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=O0Hsw1OBcqrEh5oj4mJXaXhvfbMkbjEqkX3dR9XWTwM=; b=oworsCx70pEOy3tnS6DOzlGtB6s6s/i54ZRVVtT1s+uJ2nxE+kBQySrZWRqGMj9evy CbiVXtXLdMKTL+W0cgvTi/Im1b5E8SDh/b5XklthodIIba7wD53bKX4e28GjC+wxn9H7 6rM4CvoHPBhfLtDr32f6TWUpqT437lSHwCsAMKmvWte3l0ajH3c5zBpFi0dGBSPjMkDO CHB4wnPdOKJSzJjhDRK2hTQrc+MxEDkja+7xqmKJTg4QhRWbQlhV4o2p1wm5vGjZrN84 weAhGxkQHjdcmWrdHNboT0baiLBdxZwNEigY6TsgtOWLClIRa27BdIU+80JdwdSn6WAT X6LA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV9sqGSp8V6icgZ/Pd2K6CJZn1zlN4uy0MwxypsT9gvKVNO/B2y Tee5n4khinaUJVMv9zJruk9j+SI+hCeoA+lkv8vWnQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzridioQiqDx7Zko4lgoosmgbEvKk7nF+NYu2R8zkdAzofAbIqF/eMUNkMQezXmdZZjzQw8bgP8quK0QFVOyDE=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:704e:: with SMTP id y14mr16222082qtm.279.1580139122703; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:32:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:31:27 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJUkwpdEnun9mjvd6UH0cVaGeh4LEsm20aq_OHUBB9JrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/e22kZ3GcVQjCBIOx3btuHWhsC24>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Progressing draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:32:07 -0000
Hi there authors and WG, I'm now the responsible AD for this document. There is *significant* history here, and it is going to take substantial archeology to rebuild the state, etc. Authors, there are currently 2 open DISUCSS positions - these DISCUSSES were opened against version -13 of the document, and it is now at version -16; it is your belief that this version addresses the DISCUSSes? Have you had substantive discussions with the DISCUSS holders (Roman and Alexey)? I'd like to get this document moved along, and / or figure out what we are doing with it. W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
- [OPSAWG] Progressing draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs Warren Kumari
- Re: [OPSAWG] Progressing draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [OPSAWG] Progressing draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs Douglas Gash (dcmgash)