Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-opsawg-ntf

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Thu, 24 September 2020 06:26 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2743A041C; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lYaVGhanQ68m; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6FD3A0417; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B301863; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:26:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.198]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 6HFK8FGQDsS4; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:26:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "DFN-Verein Global Issuing CA" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:26:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9789C20156; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:26:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10028) with ESMTP id kEr0x8WLzAG2; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:26:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.218.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261CF20154; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:26:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:26:42 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Cc: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200924062642.fgx5wmvq3hnlrrhm@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org>
References: <8b6fe577bb5542b8b1921b9457bd9248@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8b6fe577bb5542b8b1921b9457bd9248@huawei.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/gP1J_OE35FbEA9p-ksEVF--7Pus>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-opsawg-ntf
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:26:48 -0000

SNMPv3 (RFC 3411 etc.) become STD 62 about 18 years ago. This document
specifically talks about SNMP version 1 and 2 (note that 'protocol
version 2' is ambiguous, likely the authors mean version 2c). I wonder
whether this is by intention (i.e., the authors want to make a point
that SNMPv3 is not used) or whether this is an oversight.

Note: I have _not_ reviewed this document, I only skimmed it and
stumbled across this.

/js

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:41:37AM +0000, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Hi WG,
> 
> 
> 
> This email starts a working group last call for draft-opsawg-ntf.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-opsawg-ntf/
> 
> 
> 
> Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are welcome.
> 
> 
> 
> The WG LC will end on 9st Oct 2020.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tianran

> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg


-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>