IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 07:50 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBAF12D7EA; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l4X_2X_HSlYF; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1945612422F; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w3J7oA6w095442 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 02:50:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, jclarke@cisco.com, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
References: <152411619849.28688.7728428588690184834.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <903ed0c6-cc4e-b5f8-0969-bfd6ff97dc74@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 02:50:05 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <152411619849.28688.7728428588690184834.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5FC3FCD8A36C262DC6335362"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/hbm682LdIOlmvHbmjH-KMaM5DOU>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:50:20 -0000

On 4/19/18 12:36 AM, Adam Roach wrote:
> §1.7:
>
>>   JSON is used as a serialization for compactness and readability,
> Perhaps cite RFC 7159 here?


Ugh. Of course I meant  RFC 8259. Sorry for the extra noise.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email