[OPSAWG] draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark
Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com Mon, 18 March 2024 06:33 UTC
Return-Path: <Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBA5C14CF01 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=swisscom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rX8qycUKaehf for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.swisscom.com (mailout110.swisscom.com [138.188.166.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE03C14CE31 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.swisscom.com; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:32:40 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=swisscom.com; s=iscm; t=1710743560; bh=kFaGt2bwuKrttSyJcmchSmzp+CA7ws0dnRBNLndKLbM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=YR4sTYRdax4AQupla1oTsFExlBjzeyEYCy5o3wDALb0zvcTM5EJnTzeOj3bZ0o/l/ wj2TIFZclT6UL8SoHTjwQXNyD2eYd1emNkhInXisj65g4NfSm72yiEMKkSK4l/snQu lyTlHvyFE3u9yES+NliCSPycnJWwM7PkTPfa3++sY+84tYTDpSX44Y8BONDpMcqW3s KDBxRp/egwP2votYay0hWfXNA4WIqgMsgwczcU92+RoBl1ZJweDrPhakSKNTNZxS+o hpS8IqJLVN8F4SK3whNIu651tv4KDirzunUn4I0VJuif5J7AxiW4M8t36HXfaK2Jiq jQ+dOs7scfeJA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="----=_Part_2099902_616475184.1710743559969"
X-Mailer: Totemo_TrustMail_(Notification)
From: Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com
To: cmpignat@ncsu.edu, adrian@olddog.co.uk, cpignata@gmail.com, opsawg@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark
Thread-Index: Adp4/XwnMh2WcXUoST25GrQBxIibow==
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 06:32:37 +0000
Message-ID: <61057ae96b744ef19ded9a6e84883325@swisscom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-CH
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_ActionId=a0569d44-94d4-4e19-bcec-853911f83e4c; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_Name=C2 Internal; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_SetDate=2024-03-18T06:27:33Z; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_SiteId=364e5b87-c1c7-420d-9bee-c35d19b557a1;
x-originating-ip: [138.188.161.184]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Trustmail: processed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/i4_28C_p5E9RHu2tNeBcj_HWjqM>
Subject: [OPSAWG] draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 06:33:01 -0000
Dear Carlos and Adrian, As the author of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry, I care and value that you are defining OAM terminology. This is much needed. Count me on the list of people who misused the term inband previously. I would appreciate of you could add also OAM node type. As an example in RFC 9398 for IOAM the following types are defined IOAM encapsulation node IOAM transit node IOAM decapsulation node It would be very useful to have an OAM protocol agnostic terminology. Best wishes Thomas
- [OPSAWG] draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-questi… Thomas.Graf
- Re: [OPSAWG] draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-qu… Alex Huang Feng
- Re: [OPSAWG] draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-qu… Carlos Pignataro
- Re: [OPSAWG] draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-qu… Carlos Pignataro
- Re: [OPSAWG] draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-qu… Carlos Pignataro