Re: [OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10: (with COMMENT)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Thu, 23 September 2021 05:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D168B3A20B5; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rg653RovKqAT; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E000E3A20A9; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HFNz45WP5z2yS4; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:30:08 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1632375008; bh=M74ttg44ZapAu0adYPM3v4emqCawKw3asW5rwaztw0o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=GaG9ZKiBfj/sqk4KsSnQQtAIfiPLM/RRuW4qNa1CZSD/XFE9fYQtGtxNITnmn25KB 6/z0a1dlhOztdfzPdaMGKmpsZUwkdN0dkdogp+11+jw9i6mBEcQ0LGjYYaZJDXvEkB fyMy/dnn5Q0Dyx//5vKSm8/STkAmWXVOaIgVOW6ML3HBTNmbdPKHhtdL0sLk05w08V TRNc3IiBG6uetogdXZoyNBs8dZm6Hi0jdkp1kZnd6l0hdXL+unmSUGdtkJ9vQSMxGI jWNayaFKSlVnE5Sk2qiL7tmrqamb6rkqpmJE0d+2JgDdu3eXnOD6sgPeA0M45l2GUO S+xeG2QYMyGSw==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HFNz43KyQzCqkk; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:30:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common@ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "suresh@kaloom.com" <suresh@kaloom.com>
Thread-Topic: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHXr+3SoZTW4/W1wkuZDNpeOhp+2quxF8fQ
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 05:30:07 +0000
Message-ID: <1412_1632375008_614C10E0_1412_252_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303540ADD2@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <163234139581.7057.10784116905823018542@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163234139581.7057.10784116905823018542@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/jBQn9GurAOf_KmLP-AQvhgtKiy4>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 05:30:18 -0000

Hi Eric, 

Thank you for the comment. 

I added this NEW text: 

   The QoS match criteria reuse groupings that are defined in the
   packet fields module "ietf-packet-fields" (Section 4.2 of
   [RFC8519]).

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Éric Vyncke via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : mercredi 22 septembre 2021 22:10
> À : The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common@ietf.org; opsawg-chairs@ietf.org;
> opsawg@ietf.org; adrian@olddog.co.uk; adrian@olddog.co.uk;
> suresh@kaloom.com
> Objet : Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-
> positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> As I am abroad on vacations, I had not time to review in depth this
> document, hence I am trusting the Internet directorate Last-Call review
> by Suresh:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-09-
> intdir-lc-krishnan-2021-08-30/
> 
> I was about to post similar comments as Erik Kline's ones about the lack
> of
> IPv6 terminology in the classification but Med's reply is OK. May I
> suggest though to clearly reference RFC 8519 (which should be updated)
> where this topic is discussed ? I also appreciate the reuse of the
> (incomplete) ACL YANG modules.
> 
> Regards
> 
> -éric
> 
> 


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.