[OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Thu, 24 September 2020 06:42 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05153A0597; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H3uYeMMQyJak; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC58D3A0489; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DED1B1B4E80630912FE6; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:42:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: from nkgeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.160) by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:42:35 +0100
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.157) by nkgeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:42:32 +0800
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.157]) by nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.157]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:42:32 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
Thread-Index: AdaSPYvICTiAtXU/STiu/7vSqFRHIg==
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:42:32 +0000
Message-ID: <f5f87ae6f92d423ebd8430a40fa7dd0f@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.128]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_f5f87ae6f92d423ebd8430a40fa7dd0fhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/jEQX_mfsCU-qgnRBeOlN4r0H8G0>
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:42:40 -0000

Sorry for attaching a wrong link to the draft. Please see as follows.



Hi Authors,



Accompany with the WG LC, this mail starts the IPR poll.



Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04?



If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04, please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).



If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email in OPSAWG mailing list regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.



If you are not listed as an author or contributor but are on OPSAWG mailing list, then please explicitly respond if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.



Thanks,

Tianran