Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]

Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7803A0EAE; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFGWct7wMAdg; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FA43A0EA9; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml736-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id F0ECFDCC8BFE08A8698D; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:23:00 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml736-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.87) by lhreml736-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:23:00 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.212) by lhreml736-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:23:00 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.14]) by DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.212]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:22:50 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
Thread-Index: AdaSPP9orIcydBuASU6vliZgCPjT/wEN6SZg
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:22:49 +0000
Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D9389149F@DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <d5d0ea857305431893f72e1d442d47cc@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <d5d0ea857305431893f72e1d442d47cc@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.216.69]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D9389149FDGGEMM532MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/jLBPk6wiEOIS30TlTVcQkeFiuPU>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:23:04 -0000

Hi All,
I support the WGLC for the draft as the contributor.


Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)



From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 2:39 PM
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]


Sorry for attaching a wrong link to the draft. Please see as follows.



Hi WG,



This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf/



Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are welcome.



The WG LC will end on 9st Oct 2020.



Thanks,

Tianran