Re: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]

Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23973A0EB6; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5Vt_IeCoR2q; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2FAD3A0F22; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml725-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1D930871CCDD1ADABACD; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:21:28 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml725-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.76) by lhreml725-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:21:27 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM422-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.39) by lhreml725-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:21:27 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.14]) by dggemm422-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:21:17 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
Thread-Index: AdaSPYvICTiAtXU/STiu/7vSqFRHIgDCJczwAEuQ/QA=
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:21:17 +0000
Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D93891483@DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <f5f87ae6f92d423ebd8430a40fa7dd0f@huawei.com> <c9f46ac07b5b438bbbf39b334d701d32@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <c9f46ac07b5b438bbbf39b334d701d32@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.216.69]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D93891483DGGEMM532MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/ldXRoOjKjI2lqLRJPZSU9x4uqfI>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:21:40 -0000

Hi All,

I am not aware of any IPR for this draft as a contributor.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)




From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 2:43 PM
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]


Sorry for attaching a wrong link to the draft. Please see as follows.



Hi Authors,



Accompany with the WG LC, this mail starts the IPR poll.



Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04?



If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04, please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).



If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email in OPSAWG mailing list regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.



If you are not listed as an author or contributor but are on OPSAWG mailing list, then please explicitly respond if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.



Thanks,

Tianran