Re: [OPSAWG] What to do about TCs for floats

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Thu, 24 March 2011 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D8E3A6857 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.570, BAYES_00=-2.599, FF_IHOPE_YOU_SINK=2.166, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T7toSERCrwPS for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43803A6847 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvYAAFMtcU3GmAcF/2dsb2JhbACYKo47dKR5ApkWhWEEkAw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,236,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="271089211"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2011 05:39:16 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,236,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="599972098"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2011 05:39:16 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:38:55 +0100
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0402DEB5A7@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <003d01cbe9e1$8b504c80$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] What to do about TCs for floats
Thread-Index: Acvp2RPTULfvFIuCTQyWx/sP09MDYQALgh6w
References: <008801cb9b00$f1bd2040$6801a8c0@oemcomputer><000401cba723$1ed28c40$6801a8c0@oemcomputer><000601cbab6f$33532e40$6801a8c0@oemcomputer><001401cbb2fb$a79cd600$6801a8c0@oemcomputer><8727FC54-B340-42F7-B2D9-2141300273A7@asgaard.org><EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0402AE2834@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com><D37703F8-B870-4DE7-8EE1-9C4D0E863036@asgaard.org><002a01cbd528$a64774a0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <003d01cbe9e1$8b504c80$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] What to do about TCs for floats
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:37:43 -0000

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:09 AM
> To: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] What to do about TCs for floats
> 
> Hi -
> 
> > From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> > To: <opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 12:14 PM
> > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] What to do about TCs for floats
> >
> > Hi -
> > 
> > Isn't it about time for a WG last call on 
> > draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats?  I'm not aware of any open 
> issues - all 
> > of the issues and word-smithing work got done while before 
> the WG even 
> > adopted this as a work item.  Since this is referenced by 
> other work 
> > (NHDP-MIB), I see no point in continuing to wait.
> > 
> > Randy
> 
> Ok, it's been nearly a month since this request, and close to 
> three months since my first request for WG last call (January 3rd).
> 
> I must have overlooked some essential step in the process, or 
> failed to make some incantation.  What more needs to be done 
> to get this document into WG last call?
> 
> Randy
> 

Hi, 

Can we include the question of sending this document to WGLC in the
status report the chairs will prepare for the meeting in Prague? 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan