IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-04

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8613A0FEB for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vilfvjACOC9G for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066F13A0FE5 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6824D300BD9 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:47:08 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id hIITd_rk4Jtg for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:47:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9675E30026C; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:47:06 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2pmyztcbl.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:47:07 -0400
Cc: Rob Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Ops Area WG <opsawg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6B3DCBE7-CB7D-421F-9CF3-78E0C6EEC61F@vigilsec.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB4366E7BB3CE2A26FB6C3FB1DB5709@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <m2pmyztcbl.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/mqIoNv7m-IQ7hE4-dYJsRia_liU>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:47:13 -0000

Responding to just two places where Randy handed off to me ...

>> 3. The definition of canonicalization refers to section 2.2 of RFC
>> 5485 (which talks about ASCII) vs RFC8805 which talks about UTF-8.  Is
>> this disparity an issue?
> 
> russ, how do you want to handle?

This is really about line endings, but it would probably be best to assign a content type for UTF8 Test with CRLF.

>   This document also suggests optional data for geofeed files to
>>   provide stronger authenticity to the data.
>> 
>> Would "optional signature data" be clearer than just "optional data"?
> 
> ok.  russ?  maybe 'authenticating'?

How about: ... optional signature, which authenticates the data when present.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email