IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] [Lsr] I,Scope of FIT Capability: a node or a link?

Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> Mon, 06 April 2020 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8307D3A0B5F; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 08:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, THIS_AD=0.148] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BeqKkzSJbC6m; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 08:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 131CE3A0B5E; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 08:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id g32so115445pgb.6; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 08:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=kttFJAzrDaWEobSVjERQQUEPEX6mPazLqvP73KqSY6k=; b=QXl7/g3h6sA/D9h+zRsl6w+Y7RKFiO5TPiqMO6cGOp0QtitX7YgHv7njJQkPPOjjol 1y/UQDrCv7SdOHsi1ysqKmSru+62owQmZD1ymJmC9bO3+W3Z9DU99cDV2UEp0Q7/5LpE FHqI1iDFgq9+Hh+t1kuY/leLic9xVZbEAjlW+rvgXP2J2YwejI8+6i7Hdd4TIWCu0vgJ SmhxxTSZffZi55XbkQECMkVewLqGXmdgbDokRps6+E8sT4lABgezYJaYu46Fh54sZ3Xp 85Fd/QOEC1PvpGpmLCrkoGHenQA27c7gKrSOzd81agC8KaVmEBVoDK6Z0ZWrvglkpohw Om6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=kttFJAzrDaWEobSVjERQQUEPEX6mPazLqvP73KqSY6k=; b=qD0/Kf0F8cQ3pMkxZlnPsCwthAtD3ijF2BKJ/iVjEJI7sofwIrZcXQ4zgKZ3b6uBfr 7+KLiv7F+rdybOitFtaR0VmuKzXdSVeFDGuxeAjg5B+ZT4eDwlbIZqdajTJTC5IM+dAw Qwd8QNlg18VyFd2EJMdNytGIo6wq5OpHROpBMutrAb4cpnBSDs4Pcfr6snGsU8+7hDRt KUFd1mSG1HK7eEWDZxqd/G3VKxHGF22xGPAnWSktuOqYDqVxhGqWayOGydJiuiOOMmyI cPIFHOVjffYrC1za2oBHhninM1L5YAMxVePXtjBH2xrK2lBFJ0BM86eXx2Yp2O73YaML Dg6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pub2GUSkA1uPoQgX5XgDKeSPfHxqKGn0d+mVpgIcHW7N2mhwjUXB GBsg84SBeQZsiGpDG0FT3UA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIk9tuf5nZvEiOa60hpq4TYTgHGEZAuYcBTMQQIXmDFybHYsQ4wh6RoaoGAr4zM0Bs3UNXYxw==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:94a5:: with SMTP id a5mr131234pfl.67.1586188656491; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.95.95.236] ([162.210.129.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f200sm11991703pfa.177.2020.04.06.08.57.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <BFBEF91A-7FD0-494D-A69F-0F9319EAD2C7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F41B94B1-8638-4C5F-BFC9-C80DF9EE10B2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 08:57:20 -0700
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB4619DBDBD80BC52A92F51176C1C20@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisement@ietf.org" <draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisement@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework@ietf.org" <draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <4da3d82b084343bfa18de192b1f390b1@huawei.com> <MW3PR11MB4619DBDBD80BC52A92F51176C1C20@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/n2JSNbVjNC2sNqOTxLtnfEvhXhk>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Lsr] I,Scope of FIT Capability: a node or a link?
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:57:39 -0000


> This discussion is interesting, but please do not ignore the considerable feedback from multiple folks indicating that this advertisement does not belong in the IGP at all (regardless of scope).
> My opinion on that has not changed.


+1

IS-IS is not the correct place to implement Service Discovery mechanisms. The management plane already has ample mechanisms for service and capability discovery.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email