IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04

"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com> Tue, 18 June 2019 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7106C12019C; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Os+J6PXE; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=kYnK8Fsy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mkno7CVIfN4i; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14646120429; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2397; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1560892791; x=1562102391; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=ZUTOcJ0j/KIezOKj+gxa824HQ0qHDDeBqGadmucxYxI=; b=Os+J6PXEXkhbsVmGe2bVIlTUKC0CS2nQWOT6xqIz2Xc/T0ZaABUUvfRp nznSPiU9Y9LXAQPFAzKwA+Tmx+p6WRN+oPghVLXXCXwAxw3IJRxiXz9jw yONOHobUo6ziR71uIlL9IfoL+dYTJJsNL8AUb9Vw5e67bJn3ubWxmUSXh 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:4bewhhTYDIrvvulb/FLsXbQ8pNpsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBdfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOi4xGM1YV1JN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AIAABtVAld/5tdJa1mGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBPVADalUgBAsoh10DhFKKE4JXlzaBLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBARgNCAIBAYN6RgKCUSM0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgEEbRwMhUoBAQEBAQEBAQEQKAYBASwLAQQLAgEIGB4QJwslAQEEDgUbB4MAAYFqAw4PAQ6fXgKBOIhfgiKCeQEBBYEyAQMEDEGCehiCEAMGgTQBi10XgUA/gTgfgkw+gjwlAQEBAQEBFoEPBQESAR+DPIImqWQJAoIQhkiEHIhvG4InhwaOB5RBj0MCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVA4Z3FwFTsqAYJBgg+CUoEehRSFP3IBgSiMNYJDAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,390,1557187200"; d="scan'208";a="286672386"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 18 Jun 2019 21:19:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5ILJnRW028925 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:19:50 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:19:49 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:19:48 -0400
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:19:48 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9GxCt5VyTx5M9X1xLNbxJpXNY60LP4iE+AAUcmGKm30=; b=kYnK8FsyI4uf0lCccm+xxMpzgTeS/iE+oM4CpbgUnSr8UdR1Apfk2vOLCM5m9fu644EfvgslRQM5uH/svSmccOT5FezItLne9IMOC2/zhlpChM5McuHtOzlAdctMO8FtoFKbMstONbEu98tHu9jzqnUIO01eCXNUKgd6Gk7qMak=
Received: from CH2PR11MB4200.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.141.118.161) by CH2PR11MB4469.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.186.148.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1987.7; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:19:46 +0000
Received: from CH2PR11MB4200.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9930:6012:eab6:73a1]) by CH2PR11MB4200.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9930:6012:eab6:73a1%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1987.014; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:19:46 +0000
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
CC: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, OpsAWG Chairs <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04
Thread-Index: AdUlnjTipSvhe5jaRA+rxdJVbLMgFgAe72AAAABmq4A=
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:19:46 +0000
Message-ID: <A85F8ED4-D5C4-4B6C-94E6-584E421CD7E4@cisco.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEE43D78@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAHw9_iJkCg66WSJ47eiDdNO_A_jvjmN-8ZynVUhyvqQFM75rKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJkCg66WSJ47eiDdNO_A_jvjmN-8ZynVUhyvqQFM75rKA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jclarke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:2170:1264:3c58:9d0f:1878:3f7f]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bd5029c5-6355-4e18-f471-08d6f432b069
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:CH2PR11MB4469;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CH2PR11MB4469:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CH2PR11MB4469C0F350DC9C2E31BA674BB8EA0@CH2PR11MB4469.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 007271867D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(396003)(376002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(81156014)(81166006)(14454004)(64756008)(91956017)(6306002)(478600001)(2906002)(53936002)(186003)(6506007)(486006)(71200400001)(446003)(36756003)(6246003)(6512007)(71190400001)(4326008)(66476007)(305945005)(102836004)(33656002)(76176011)(476003)(6486002)(6916009)(73956011)(6116002)(6436002)(2616005)(54906003)(316002)(7736002)(8676002)(66556008)(53546011)(76116006)(11346002)(5660300002)(86362001)(99286004)(66946007)(229853002)(8936002)(68736007)(66446008)(46003)(256004)(966005)(14444005)(25786009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CH2PR11MB4469; H:CH2PR11MB4200.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: SrTWKDx/6/tMfrFdYvTcXORVo0sQ8iEw0HOGaFIvcelo7q+/jrYW/yoNvqbCK27bu6MyI6nRUrvb1gMB+eIr10nHjxrOZmFfpgFo9bU4aO5/RsOMCX0uq6TJDvJ9qwuGMiry5QBfZcV8GL928BxZD5RuQLw8OcmAnpLne9ujB6pdPU05ZgAUZp7BzhXAlsCB113iOB4fmfq6xXyxtOBcg0VjnwqBDFQUQSPs/1bw7Nm/ijtgez5dZ8xfzBTaiwwNHpuIl7DVAvwoq1vERGD5J+0eM4ce9s0m+/0oWtCBs8cnCcHFlLuFn7IZ9Nv4qPMhVp2MQKrlSm/P7bACgfvEADd5xcqR9c22LPphJamVTqPpFfQUWxhLL44y1BXTv+FIOAwzgmyVgBnzb+f0fTCbGpbkjj8ZnZ3CKB/fa178bzQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D166C281A533C84D86E1271C7FF00C74@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bd5029c5-6355-4e18-f471-08d6f432b069
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Jun 2019 21:19:46.3580 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jclarke@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CH2PR11MB4469
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/n4UB1uR2M14gdMaAtXk5F9azwbs>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:19:54 -0000

I have reviewed the material and the draft (latest).  As an individual, I support adoption of this draft as a WG item.

Joe

> On Jun 18, 2019, at 17:08, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> Dear OpsAWG,
> 
> Here is a link to the slidedeck from IETF104 to refresh your memory -
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/slides-104-opsawg-draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-01.pdf
> -- basically the entire document is summarized in 2 slides (slide 9,
> 10).
> If you'd prefer video -- https://youtu.be/a479Zohc5yg?t=1266
> 
> The main design criteria for this was to be as simple as possible, to
> make it trivial to implement and use. This is specifically designed to
> just augment existing auto-install functionality; there are much more
> ambitious and fully featured solutions (such as ANIMA and RFC 8572)
> available for those who can / want to use them.
> 
> I'd really appreciate your review and comment; it's short (if you
> ignore the ASCII art diagrams and example appendix and similar it is 7
> or 8 pages, and much of that is background).
> W
> 
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:39 AM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi WG,
>> 
>> This document was presented in Prague, and got good feedback. The authors have addressed all the comments.
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi/
>> 
>> The chairs think this informational draft is easy to be implemented, and got good support.
>> 
>> This email starts a two weeks poll for adoption.
>> If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be willing to review and help the draft.
>> If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work on this topic, please say why.
>> This poll will run until 2nd July.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tianran & Joe
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSAWG mailing list
>> OPSAWG@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email