Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network functions?
"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Wed, 12 December 2018 01:07 UTC
Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28828127598; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:07:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W0t8JdfQY0WD; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:07:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B511F129A87; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:07:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id n3so2729997iog.12; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:07:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eqfjoyXbXGdXwTodH1bzuNaF2HLtUFAlECLv9jE43VU=; b=pP3GaJH3vOfe76QAmrM09naPZ8D0th/Ou6R1hY/8gurkNGK8w0+BKssIuFf2GfcYHv BPgUNwrg8tCEg3lPpHMUuC+MarGnJqCUc9BzUqg3CipN1gULrbmPb4WcdyskjaDb+/bE nm06lFC1suasTUQjQexl/T32sJABcnriiwmysz7LNXo1Xp+TYwACKpnZStvzUfEvy25P kGIvSgbJnni3yl/JXiA4UH9dBEn9YoKEpiZlQuXmPXHPczGg07dSu+0uA/TrPGToIbOq Z1xI11GTg2mmjd1QOELpJvnRFkhdn9Ns7PtZreloRv6TMBCg6RSe4IA0gOqCcrVgODpA Cmyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eqfjoyXbXGdXwTodH1bzuNaF2HLtUFAlECLv9jE43VU=; b=ETjBRbAR3qnSZUGhkyxMTltMdyHOagLk+3N4UTB1NRsGVO/vkgSfoO0R0RFVAfXxr7 yatu/Cco+wvtSKKZ+vFKWlvqmxvDGwsiKb7SlS3K1UVICwyGU1ifVXO4+JX+jH++s6mf lpi7JW/u1sketX4BHbWl6sCj0rC5YZgApcvV5RehnU8MnsCfg+pQZ4cEpiiH1DQOr9/4 PgMzDW5UdmjHIead2kTBPA+OLq7vvWFjc8GsEypicRljT4HukzJ8W80ZNH/F8PhG5qOm USj++RUUBXE5go5RhnrgJxCEXLFIgY0E34vt3ODaydP+7Grsw8V69OHDss8yzTYLa4Kl mEDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYS+ccTe2ab9D45uhPJfL4n6fowNSz6cnb+QsaqoDwYGaOq3K2B O7lIa65FVVjiqSknv9qDmDvkUKoI13fzokNKm9c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/U2bgLkl5os3yU7Mo/wcIs0JgokBKF7jq6jMUxAIi82WT+7NG7rSp4jLy0ld2vnaV1un7SM0rQVLhhbAf9n5q4=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e802:: with SMTP id f2mr14682371ioh.296.1544576845872; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:07:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B1F609F@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com> <039901d49143$5d6dcba0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B20E18F@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B20E18F@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:06:52 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPK2Dey7njzgUkWyfgicu3GrJdCtO7yurgEAo=+ZTB1e1kVjjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Cc: ietfc@btconnect.com, opsawg@ietf.org, draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model@ietf.org, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003a0613057cc8d292"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/noYVljf9mTnkNb2wLXrT9zrJB4E>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network functions?
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 01:07:30 -0000
Hi Linda, We authors will reflect Tom's comments on the revision. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:12 AM Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> wrote: > Tom, > > Thank you very much for the review and comments. So there is no duplicated > work in OpsArea? > > > Authors of the draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model: Can you please > update the draft per Tom's comments. > > Linda. > > -----Original Message----- > From: tom petch [mailto:ietfc@btconnect.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:22 AM > To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org > Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network > functions? > > Linda > > I looked at the draft and think that it needs some work before it is a > YANG module:-) > > - NMDA conformance is not mentioned > > - the reference to RFC2119 is out of date > > - the format for tree diagrams is now specified in RFC8340 > > - YANG import statements lack 'reference' as in > import ietf-inet-types { > prefix "inet"; > reference "RFC 6991 - Common YANG Data Types"; > > - YANG module has no copyright > > - YANG module has (almost) no reference statements to tell the user (like > me) whereto go to understand it. look, for example, at > draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang for a module that is well supplied with > reference statements > > - YANG module should reference the RFC from which it comes > > - the one and only reference in the YANG module is > reference > "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07"; > but the I-D is > draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06 > I do not understand > > - where you reference an I-D, it needs a Note to the RFC Editor e.g. > reference "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07"; > becomes > reference RFC YYYY "....." > -- Note to RFC Editor please replace YYYY with the number assigned to > "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring" > > - IANA Considerations must be present > > - Security Considerations must include the YANG template > > HTH:-) > > I am not on the I2NSF list. > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Linda Dunbar" <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> > To: <opsawg@ietf.org> > Cc: <i2nsf@ietf.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 5:27 PM > > > OpsaWG: > > > > I2NSF WG has a draft on data models (and information model) of > monitoring network security functions: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-0 > 6 > > > > It includes data models to retrieve System Alarms, System Events, > counters, NSF Events/logs, etc. > > > > Want to see if there are data models already specified by Ops Area for > monitoring network functions which might have some common attributes that > I2NSF can import. > > > > Thanks, Linda Dunbar > > > > From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:jaehoon.paul@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 6:35 PM > > To: Linda Dunbar > <linda.dunbar@huawei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@huawei.com>>; Yoav Nir < > ynir.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:ynir.ietf@gmail.com>> > > Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>; > skku_secu-brain_all@googlegroups.com<mailto:skku_secu-brain_all@googlegr > oups.com>; Sangwon Hyun <swhyun77@gmail.com<mailto:swhyun77@gmail.com>>; > Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong > <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com<mailto:jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>> > > Subject: Request for WG Adoption Call on NSF Monitoring Draft > > > > Hi Linda and Yoav, > > As we discussed the last Bangkok meeting, I have merged the two drafts > > of Information Model and Data Model for NSF Monitoring into a new > > draft called > draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06: > > > > - Two Information and Data Model Drafts . > > draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07 > > . draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-05 > > > > - A Merged Data Model Draft > > . draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06 > > . > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-0 > 6 > > > > The NSF monitoring is very important to manage the I2NSF security > service system > > in a reliable and scalable fashion. > > > > Could you start a WG adoption call for this draft? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > Paul > > -- > > =========================== > > Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. > > Associate Professor > > Department of Software > > Sungkyunkwan University > > Office: +82-31-299-4957 > > Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com<mailto:jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>, > pauljeong@skku.edu<mailto:pauljeong@skku.edu> > > Personal Homepage: > http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php<http://cpslab.skku.edu/p > eople-jaehoon-jeong.php <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>> > > -- =========================== Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Software Sungkyunkwan University Office: +82-31-299-4957 Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com, pauljeong@skku.edu Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>
- [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monito… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for mo… tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for mo… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [OPSAWG] [I2nsf] is there any work in Ops Are… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for mo… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for mo… tom petch