IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sun, 15 April 2018 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4751250B8; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ly-jOWLU2cz5; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BBEB127241; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1f7qWn-0004AM-4c; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:53:45 +0000
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:53:43 -0700
Message-ID: <m2lgdonkso.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org>, li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <62aa2b28-05c6-37a3-d4cc-142395b28fe0@joelhalpern.com>
References: <152363066886.26321.3212300538180273898@ietfa.amsl.com> <HKXPR0601MB1799868866AF89F9699EAF28FCB10@HKXPR0601MB1799.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <20180415160956.GC66082@shrubbery.net> <ace47a71-0e9d-6a0d-ae37-1f4bc48ada0b@stevecrocker.com> <m2muy4nlz0.wl-randy@psg.com> <62aa2b28-05c6-37a3-d4cc-142395b28fe0@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/oogAenF0Zt2pTQda13uLnXlst3o>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:53:51 -0000

> Thus, again, you are not making a case for why the existing techniques
> which are easier to implement and deploy are not sufficie3nt for the
> problem.

correct.  i, and a couple of other ops, are making the case that
communities are fairly widely used for tagging geo loc at varying
granularities.  you are not required to agree.

and you can argue the rest with someone else.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email