Re: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8886 (6299)

"bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr" <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> Mon, 12 April 2021 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane@sources.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F36E3A12A9 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QfmjUZAA5IL for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [92.243.4.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC6ED3A12A4 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 5E27AA0279; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 20:58:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08714190006; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 20:55:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 20:55:39 +0200
From: "bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr" <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "warren@kumari.net" <warren@kumari.net>, "cdoyle@juniper.net" <cdoyle@juniper.net>, "henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de" <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, "zhoutianran@huawei.com" <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr" <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210412185539.GA31336@sources.org>
References: <20201005192449.5CC98F406D0@rfc-editor.org> <MN2PR11MB436697A1F966B91BC8A35C43B5709@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BN6PR11MB16672778E922DCD780FBA5E6B8709@BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR11MB4366A200DDDDBCA78A3971A3B5709@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4366A200DDDDBCA78A3971A3B5709@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.9
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/r2tanjkVKoa8xLU9jlsSCCSGdyg>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8886 (6299)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:58:13 -0000

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:06:09PM +0000,
 Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote 
 a message of 120 lines which said:

> Perhaps the explanation text needs a bit more clarity (that's
> presuming that my explanation is on the right track).

Yes, perfectly correct. Sorry, I did not provide a copy-and-paste fix
because I'm not a S/MIME expert.